261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12939886)
1. Re-evaluating revalidation and appraisal.
Pringle M
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jun; 53(491):437-8. PubMed ID: 12939886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Opening Pandora's box.
Wong G
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jul; 53(492):566. PubMed ID: 14694678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The management of poor performance.
Mayberry JF
Postgrad Med J; 2007 Feb; 83(976):105-8. PubMed ID: 17308213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How to assess your specialist registrar.
Davies H; Howells R
Arch Dis Child; 2004 Dec; 89(12):1089-93. PubMed ID: 15557038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Personnel appraisal.
Giddins GE
Br J Hosp Med; 1995 Feb 15-28; 53(4):162-5. PubMed ID: 7735665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of the quality of professional activities of military specialists].
Reshetnikov MM
Voen Med Zh; 1985 Jul; (7):47-9. PubMed ID: 4049774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The struggling resident: avoiding Pygmalion and learned helplessness by using nontechnical performance assessment systems.
Abouleish AE
Anesthesiology; 2010 May; 112(5):1067-9. PubMed ID: 20418683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Professional development. Part 5: Performance evaluation.
Touchstone M
EMS Mag; 2009 Jun; 38(6):63-4. PubMed ID: 19579468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Employee performance: for the good of all.
Topjian DF; Buck TF; Kozlowski R
Nurs Manage; 2009 Apr; 40(4):24-9. PubMed ID: 19346921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Staff development through appraisal.
Wheeler J
Nurs Times; 2001 Sep 27-Oct 3; 97(39):34-5. PubMed ID: 11935768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Does your appraisal system measure up?
Wilson P; Bodden JS
Nurs Manag (Harrow); 1999 Apr; 6(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 10382522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ensuring the integrity of appraisal systems.
Shaw S
Nurs N Z; 2000 Feb; 6(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 11040689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing nursing competency.
Roman M
Medsurg Nurs; 2005 Jun; 14(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 16035631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of work of the specialists of radiological divisions of sanitary-epidemiological stations].
Bobyleva OA; Proklina TL; Rudoĭ VM
Gig Sanit; 1991 Dec; (12):74-5. PubMed ID: 1816046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of coworkers. 1. The comparison with other coworkers is useful for all].
Gremmel-Thomas E; Petrachi F
Pflege Z; 1998 Mar; 51(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 9588340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A crisis in confidence: a combined challenge and opportunity for medical imaging providers.
Reiner BI
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 24332819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Physicians and nurses compared: results of a clinical study].
Assist Inferm Ric; 2000; 19(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 11107361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tools for appraisal and revalidation--evaluation of regionally delivered workshops.
Braithwaite MG; Thornton R
Occup Med (Lond); 2012 Apr; 62(3):220-2. PubMed ID: 22394679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Grading, evaluation, what do they mean?].
Malhomme ML
Soins Form Pedagog Encadr; 2000; (35):38-40. PubMed ID: 11111727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A mock trial approach: nursing competency program.
Patrick S
J Nurses Staff Dev; 2008; 24(4):194. PubMed ID: 18685484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
