These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12940555)

  • 1. The effect of axial midline angulation on dental esthetics.
    Thomas JL; Hayes C; Zawaideh S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 12940555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of mesiodistal angulation of the maxillary central incisors on esthetic perceptions of the smile in the frontal view.
    Yang S; Guo Y; Yang X; Zhang F; Wang J; Qiu J; Li J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):396-404. PubMed ID: 26321337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypeople to altered maxillary incisor crowding.
    Ma W; Preston B; Asai Y; Guan H; Guan G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):579-86. PubMed ID: 25439208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?
    Shyagali TR; Chandralekha B; Bhayya DP; Kumar S; Balasubramanyam G
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19113072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination.
    Ghaleb N; Bouserhal J; Bassil-Nassif N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 20716642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of maxillary incisor edge asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Machado AW; Moon W; Gandini LG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):658-64. PubMed ID: 23631967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of buccolingual inclinations of maxillary canines and premolars on perceived smile attractiveness.
    Xu H; Han X; Wang Y; Shu R; Jing Y; Tian Y; Andrews WA; Andrews LF; Bai D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 25636551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons.
    Kumar S; Gandhi S; Valiathan A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):295. PubMed ID: 22945732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings.
    Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson MR
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Oct; 21(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 10565092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of maxillary canine gingival margin asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Correa BD; Vieira Bittencourt MA; Machado AW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24373655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople.
    Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 18575307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of dental asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics.
    Pinho S; Ciriaco C; Faber J; Lenza MA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec; 132(6):748-53. PubMed ID: 18068592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptions of dental professionals and laypersons to altered dental esthetics: asymmetric and symmetric situations.
    Kokich VO; Kokich VG; Kiyak HA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Aug; 130(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16905057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness.
    Chang CA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Springer NC; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel S; Christensen JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e171-80. PubMed ID: 21967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of symmetric and asymmetric alterations of maxillary canine gingival margin on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists, dentists, and laypersons.
    Katiyar S; Gandhi S; Sodawala J; Anita G; Hamdani S; Jain S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):586-591. PubMed ID: 28169254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception differences of altered dental esthetics by dental professionals and laypersons.
    Thomas M; Reddy R; Reddy BJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):242-7. PubMed ID: 21891893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the presence of unilateral maxillary incisor edge asymmetries influence the perception of smile esthetics?
    Betrine Ribeiro J; Alecrim Figueiredo B; Wilson Machado A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Jul; 29(4):291-297. PubMed ID: 28556552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes.
    Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness.
    Martin AJ; Buschang PH; Boley JC; Taylor RW; McKinney TW
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):530-7. PubMed ID: 17974544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preferences for vertical position of the maxillary lateral incisors.
    King KL; Evans CA; Viana G; BeGole E; Obrez A
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 18575309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.