96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12940556)
1. Perception of facial esthetics: a comparison of similar class II cases treated with attempted growth modification or later orthognathic surgery.
Shell TL; Woods MG
Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):365-73. PubMed ID: 12940556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
Shell TL; Woods MG
Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: Perception of facial esthetics: a comparison of similar Class II cases treated with attempted growth modification or later orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod. 2003;73:365-373.
Gunson MJ
Angle Orthod; 2003 Dec; 73(6):629; author reply 629-30. PubMed ID: 14719725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
Baker BW; Woods MG
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporation of facial plastic surgery in the planning and treatment of orthognathic surgical cases.
Sarver DM; Matukas VJ; Weissman SM
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1991; 6(4):227-39. PubMed ID: 1820407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles after treatment with headgear or Herbst appliance.
Sloss EA; Southard KA; Qian F; Stock SE; Mann KR; Meyer DL; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18405814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Realities of craniofacial growth modification.
Kluemper GT; Spalding PM
Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):23-51. PubMed ID: 11905336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance.
Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
Stalpers MJ; Booij JW; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Katsaros C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17826599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dentofacial growth in orthodontically treated and untreated children with juvenile chronic arthritis (JCA). A comparison with Angle Class II division 1 subjects.
Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S; Thilander B
Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):357-73. PubMed ID: 8529749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Considerations for orthognathic surgery during growth, part 2: maxillary deformities.
Wolford LM; Karras SC; Mehra P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Feb; 119(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 11174554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy.
Faltin KJ; Faltin RM; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Ghiozzi B; McNamara JA
Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 12828429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A long-term follow-up study of Class II malocclusion correction after treatment with Class II elastics or fixed functional appliances.
Nelson B; Hägg U; Hansen K; Bendeus M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 17920503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
