These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12940563)

  • 1. Effects of ligation type and method on the resistance to sliding of novel orthodontic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):418-30. PubMed ID: 12940563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Oct; 120(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 11606960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resistance to sliding of orthodontic brackets with bumps in the slot floors and walls: effects of second-order angulation.
    Thorstenson GA; Kusy RP
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):881-92. PubMed ID: 15451244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resistance to sliding of titanium brackets tested against stainless steel and beta-titanium archwires with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Whitley JQ; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17346598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of stainless steel inserts on the resistance to sliding of esthetic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Thorstenson G; Kusy R
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 12725373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: Part II--The active configuration.
    Kusy RP; O'grady PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 11113803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
    Rajakulendran J; Jones S
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of friction forces between stainless steel wires and "reduced-friction" self-ligating brackets.
    Reznikov N; Har-Zion G; Barkana I; Abed Y; Redlich M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):330-8. PubMed ID: 20816303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester.
    Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS; Kim CW
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 15673146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
    Husain N; Kumar A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.
    Tecco S; Teté S; Festa M; Festa F
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e133-44. PubMed ID: 21490982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In-vitro evaluation of frictional resistance with 5 ligation methods and Gianelly-type working wires.
    Kahlon S; Rinchuse D; Robison JM; Close JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 20620835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires.
    Ozturk Ortan Y; Yurdakuloglu Arslan T; Aydemir B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 21239394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
    Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
    Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of interbracket distances on the resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances.
    Whitley JQ; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):360-72. PubMed ID: 17826605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frictional resistances of metal-lined ceramic brackets versus conventional stainless steel brackets and development of 3-D friction maps.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Oct; 71(5):364-74. PubMed ID: 11605870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Resistance to sliding with 3 types of elastomeric modules.
    Griffiths HS; Sherriff M; Ireland AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):670-5; quiz 754. PubMed ID: 15953891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A stainless steel bracket for orthodontic application.
    Oh KT; Choo SU; Kim KM; Kim KN
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 15947222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
    Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.