These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1294198)

  • 1. The function relating the subjective magnitude of brain stimulation reward to stimulation strength varies with site of stimulation.
    Leon M; Gallistel CR
    Behav Brain Res; 1992 Dec; 52(2):183-93. PubMed ID: 1294198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-stimulating rats combine subjective reward magnitude and subjective reward rate multiplicatively.
    Leon MI; Gallistel CR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1998 Jul; 24(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 12150166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring the subjective magnitude of brain stimulation reward by titration with rate of reward.
    Gallistel CR; Leon M
    Behav Neurosci; 1991 Dec; 105(6):913-25. PubMed ID: 1663762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Saturation of subjective reward magnitude as a function of current and pulse frequency.
    Simmons JM; Gallistel CR
    Behav Neurosci; 1994 Feb; 108(1):151-60. PubMed ID: 8192841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective reward magnitude of medial forebrain stimulation as a function of train duration and pulse frequency.
    Mark TA; Gallistel CR
    Behav Neurosci; 1993 Apr; 107(2):389-401. PubMed ID: 8484902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Behavioral methods for inferring anatomical linkage between rewarding brain stimulation sites.
    Shizgal P; Bielajew C; Corbett D; Skelton R; Yeomans J
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1980 Apr; 94(2):227-37. PubMed ID: 6965946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interhemispheric links in brain stimulation reward.
    Malette J; Miliaressis E
    Behav Brain Res; 1995 Jun; 68(2):117-37. PubMed ID: 7654299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of current on the maximum possible reward.
    Gallistel CR; Leon M; Waraczynski M; Hanau MS
    Behav Neurosci; 1991 Dec; 105(6):901-12. PubMed ID: 1663761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation effects of medial forebrain bundle micro-electrical stimulation.
    Farakhor S; Shalchyan V; Daliri MR
    Bioengineered; 2019 Dec; 10(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 30916601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Destruction of the medial forebrain bundle caudal to the site of stimulation reduces rewarding efficacy but destruction rostrally does not.
    Gallistel CR; Leon M; Lim BT; Sim JC; Waraczynski M
    Behav Neurosci; 1996 Aug; 110(4):766-90. PubMed ID: 8864268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of operant and electrode placement on self-stimulation train duration response functions.
    Markou A; Frank RA
    Physiol Behav; 1987; 41(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 3501594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimization of Medial Forebrain Bundle Stimulation Parameters for Operant Conditioning of Rats.
    Kong C; Shin J; Koh CS; Lee J; Yoon MS; Cho YK; Kim S; Jun SB; Jung HH; Chang JW
    Stereotact Funct Neurosurg; 2019; 97(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30933953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intermittent rewards raise self-stimulation thresholds.
    Fouriezos G; Emdin K; Beaudoin L
    Behav Brain Res; 1996 Jan; 74(1-2):57-64. PubMed ID: 8851915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of lesions of areas of brain--stimulation reward of one region of brain on operant behaviour for receiving electrical stimulation into sites of another region and on operant behaviour for food reward.
    Pandhari SR; Desiraju T
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 1990 Oct; 34(4):235-51. PubMed ID: 2100286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of endocannabinoid neurotransmission modulators on brain stimulation reward.
    Vlachou S; Nomikos GG; Panagis G
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Oct; 188(3):293-305. PubMed ID: 16953388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-dependent properties of brain stimulation reward.
    Lyons HI; Freedman NL
    Behav Brain Res; 1982 Apr; 4(4):339-58. PubMed ID: 6978722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does the MFB convey functionally different reward signals?
    Anderson R; Miliaressis E
    Behav Brain Res; 1994 Jan; 60(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 8185853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rewarding effectiveness of caudal MFB stimulation is unaltered following DMH lesions.
    Waraczynski M; Conover K; Shizgal P
    Physiol Behav; 1992 Aug; 52(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 1523244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictable and unpredictable rewards produce similar changes in dopamine tone.
    Hernandez G; Haines E; Rajabi H; Stewart J; Arvanitogiannis A; Shizgal P
    Behav Neurosci; 2007 Oct; 121(5):887-95. PubMed ID: 17907821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactions between amygdaloid and hypothalamic self-stimulation: a re-examination.
    Kane F; Coulombe D; Miliaressis E
    Behav Brain Res; 1991 Aug; 44(2):169-83. PubMed ID: 1751008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.