298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12942058)
1. Effects of bur abrasive particle size and abutment composition on preparation of ceramic implant abutments.
Blue DS; Griggs JA; Woody RD; Miller BH
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 12942058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ceramic implant abutments: cutting efficiency and resultant surface finish by diamond rotary cutting instruments.
Park SW; Driscoll CF; Romberg EE; Siegel S; Thompson G
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):444-9. PubMed ID: 16765157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of different polishing protocols on the surface roughness of Y-TZP surfaces used for custom-made implant abutments: a controlled morphologic SEM and profilometric pilot study.
Happe A; Röling N; Schäfer A; Rothamel D
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 25749083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The implant-abutment interface of alumina and zirconia abutments.
Yüzügüllü B; Avci M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 May; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 18218054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of surface-finishing protocols on the roughness, color change, and translucency of different ceramic systems.
Akar GC; Pekkan G; Çal E; Eskitaşçıoğlu G; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 24513427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
Vult von Steyern P
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Polishing Bur Application Force and Reuse on Sintered Zirconia Surface Topography.
Fischer NG; Tsujimoto A; Baruth AG
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(4):437-446. PubMed ID: 29547346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutments with CAD/CAM commercially fabricated zirconia implant abutments.
Kim S; Kim HI; Brewer JD; Monaco EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 19328275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Heat transfer to the implant-bone interface during preparation of a zirconia/alumina abutment.
Huh JB; Eckert SE; Ko SM; Choi YG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):679-83. PubMed ID: 19885408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics.
Borges GA; Sophr AM; de Goes MF; Sobrinho LC; Chan DC
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):479-88. PubMed ID: 12806326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.
Mehl C; Zhang Q; Lehmann F; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):214-219. PubMed ID: 29627210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of the effects of handpiece speed, abrasive characteristics, and polishing load on the flexural strength of polished ceramics.
Ahmad R; Morgano SM; Wu BM; Giordano RA
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Nov; 94(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 16275301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of surface treatments on the properties and morphological change of dental zirconia.
Hallmann L; Ulmer P; Wille S; Polonskyi O; Köbel S; Trottenberg T; Bornholdt S; Haase F; Kersten H; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 26581661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance and failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments.
Aramouni P; Zebouni E; Tashkandi E; Dib S; Salameh Z; Almas K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Nov; 9(7):41-8. PubMed ID: 18997915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
