These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12942196)

  • 1. Unstable subtrochanteric fractures--gamma nail versus dynamic condylar screw.
    Pakuts AJ
    Int Orthop; 2004 Feb; 28(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 12942196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.
    Madsen JE; Naess L; Aune AK; Alho A; Ekeland A; Strømsøe K
    J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 9619458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. A comparison of the Gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw: short-term outcome in 58 patients.
    Saarenpää I; Heikkinen T; Jalovaara P
    Int Orthop; 2007 Feb; 31(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 16633810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nail.
    Min WK; Kim SY; Kim TK; Lee KB; Cho MR; Ha YC; Koo KH
    J Trauma; 2007 Nov; 63(5):1054-60. PubMed ID: 17993950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Effectiveness analysis of closed or limited open reduction and intramedullary nail fixation in treatment of Seinsheimer type Ⅴ subtrochanteric fracture].
    Yao X; Wu L; Li J; Huang W; Duan X; Gu Z; Wang Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 34(4):457-462. PubMed ID: 32291981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconstruction femoral nailing for nonunion of subtrochanteric fracture: a revision technique following dynamic condylar screw failure.
    Charnley GJ; Ward AJ
    Int Orthop; 1996; 20(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 8881892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proximal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation.
    Curtis MJ; Jinnah RH; Wilson V; Cunningham BW
    Injury; 1994 Mar; 25(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 8138307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for stable and unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures : 17,341 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register.
    Grønhaug KML; Dybvik E; Matre K; Östman B; Gjertsen JE
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Feb; 104-B(2):274-282. PubMed ID: 35094569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures.
    Stern R; Lübbeke A; Suva D; Miozzari H; Hoffmeyer P
    Int Orthop; 2011 Dec; 35(12):1855-61. PubMed ID: 21387175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A review on 161 subtrochanteric fractures--risk factors influencing outcome: age, fracture pattern and fracture level.
    Vanderschot P; Vanderspeeten K; Verheyen L; Broos P
    Unfallchirurg; 1995 May; 98(5):265-71. PubMed ID: 7610387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures with the AO dynamic condylar screw.
    Nungu KS; Olerud C; Rehnberg L
    Injury; 1993 Feb; 24(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 8505134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of compression hip screw and gamma nail for treatment of peritrochanteric fractures.
    Bess RJ; Jolly SA
    J South Orthop Assoc; 1997; 6(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 9322196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation Vs. Proximal Femur Nail For Unstable Per-Trochanteric Fractures: A Comparative Analysis Of Outcomes And Complications.
    Memon K; Siddiqui AM; Khan ZA; Zahoor A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2021; 33(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 33774951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experimental examination for optimized stabilisation of trochanteric femur fractures, intra- or extramedullary implant localisation and influence of femur neck component profile on cut-out risk].
    Friedl W; Clausen J
    Chirurg; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1344-52. PubMed ID: 11766660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.