These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12942963)

  • 1. A new microphone system for near whispering.
    Choi S; Moon W; Lee JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):801-12. PubMed ID: 12942963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
    van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of microphone type on acoustic measures of voice.
    Parsa V; Jamieson DG; Pretty BR
    J Voice; 2001 Sep; 15(3):331-43. PubMed ID: 11575630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A directional adaptive least-mean-square acoustic array for hearing aid enhancement.
    DeBrunner VE; McKinney ED
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul; 98(1):437-44. PubMed ID: 7608404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of in-the-ear microphone directionality on sound direction identification.
    Chung K; Neuman AC; Higgins M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2264-75. PubMed ID: 18397031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive measures of directional benefit part 1: estimating the directivity index on a manikin.
    Dittberner AB; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):26-45. PubMed ID: 17204897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a portable two-microphone adaptive beamforming speech processor with cochlear implant patients.
    van Hoesel RJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2498-503. PubMed ID: 7714267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech intelligibility differences across sound classes with in-the-ear and free-field microphones in quiet.
    Estis JM; Parisi JA; Moore RE; Brungart DS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Jun; 112(3):845-59. PubMed ID: 21853774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guidelines for selecting microphones for human voice production research.
    Svec JG; Granqvist S
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Nov; 19(4):356-68. PubMed ID: 20601621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech intelligibility in noise using throat and acoustic microphones.
    Acker-Mills BE; Houtsma AJ; Ahroon WA
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Jan; 77(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 16422450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Directional hearing aid based on array technology.
    Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ; Verschuure J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():20-7. PubMed ID: 8153561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
    Bilsen FA; Soede W; Berkhout AJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements.
    Titze IR; Winholtz WS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1177-90. PubMed ID: 8114484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
    Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of a directional microphone array for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Soede W; Bilsen FA; Berkhout AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Aug; 94(2 Pt 1):799-808. PubMed ID: 8370886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sound Localization and Speech Enhancement Algorithm Based on Dual-Microphone.
    Tao T; Zheng H; Yang J; Guo Z; Zhang Y; Ao J; Chen Y; Lin W; Tan X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A miniaturized adaptive microphone array under directional constraint utilizing aggregated microphones.
    Matsumoto M; Hashimoto S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jan; 119(1):352-9. PubMed ID: 16454290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.