These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12942985)

  • 1. Speech production in noise with and without hearing protection.
    Tufts JB; Frank T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):1069-80. PubMed ID: 12942985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The cafeteria study: Effects of facial masks, hearing protection, and real-world noise on speech recognition.
    Barrett ME; Gordon-Salant S; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Dec; 150(6):4244. PubMed ID: 34972285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of hearing protection worn by talker and/or target listener on speech production in quiet and noise.
    Vaziri G; Giguère C; Dajani HR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1528. PubMed ID: 36182271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Double hearing protection and speech intelligibility-room for improvement.
    Wagstaff AS; Woxen OJ
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2001 Apr; 72(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 11318022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in voice level and fundamental frequency with changing background noise level and talker-to-listener distance while wearing hearing protectors: A pilot study.
    Bouserhal RE; Macdonald EN; Falk TH; Voix J
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 1():S13-20. PubMed ID: 26765993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of speech produced in noise.
    Pittman AL; Wiley TL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 11407555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Signal detection and speech perception with level-dependent hearing protectors.
    Abel SM; Krever EM; Giguere C; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 2030537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing speech in noise: seeing a loud talker is better.
    Kim J; Sironic A; Davis C
    Perception; 2011; 40(7):853-62. PubMed ID: 22128557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.
    Ferguson SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of hearing protection devices on speech intelligibility of Persian employees.
    Karami M; Aliabadi M; Golmohammadi R; Hamidi Nahrani M
    BMC Res Notes; 2020 Nov; 13(1):529. PubMed ID: 33176877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A trail of individual education for hearing protection with an instrument that measures the noise attenuation effect of wearing earplugs.
    Tsukada T; Sakakibara H
    Ind Health; 2008 Aug; 46(4):393-6. PubMed ID: 18716388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
    Abel SM; Odell P
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits of spatial hearing to speech recognition in young people with normal hearing.
    Song PL; Li HJ; Wang NY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Dec; 124(24):4269-74. PubMed ID: 22340398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.