These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12942986)

  • 1. Squared error as a measure of perceived phase distortion.
    Pobloth H; Kleijn WB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):1081-94. PubMed ID: 12942986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual consequences of different signal changes due to binaural noise reduction: do hearing loss and working memory capacity play a role?
    Neher T; Grimm G; Hohmann V
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e213-27. PubMed ID: 25010636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of degradation of intensity, time, or frequency content on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):529-42. PubMed ID: 11508977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responsiveness of the human auditory cortex to degraded speech sounds: reduction of amplitude resolution vs. additive noise.
    Miettinen I; Alku P; Salminen N; May PJ; Tiitinen H
    Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 1367():298-309. PubMed ID: 20969833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-correlation procedures for measuring noise and distortion in AGC hearing aids.
    Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3407-14. PubMed ID: 10875385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective evaluation of speech signal quality by the prediction of multiple foreground diagnostic acceptability measure attributes.
    Sen D; Lu W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4087-103. PubMed ID: 22559381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A perceptual study of source coding of Fourier phase and amplitude of the linear predictive coding residual of vowel sounds.
    Ma C; O'Shaughnessy D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2231-9. PubMed ID: 8201119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
    Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory Training Effects on the Listening Skills of Children With Auditory Processing Disorder.
    Loo JH; Rosen S; Bamiou DE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 26418044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model-based speech enhancement using a bone-conducted signal.
    Kechichian P; Srinivasan S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL262-7. PubMed ID: 22423818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the significance of phase in the short term Fourier spectrum for speech intelligibility.
    Kazama M; Gotoh S; Tohyama M; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1432-9. PubMed ID: 20329843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional modulation of the early cortical representation of speech signals in informational or energetic masking.
    Zhang C; Lu L; Wu X; Li L
    Brain Lang; 2014 Aug; 135():85-95. PubMed ID: 24992572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of hearing ability and speech distortion in the facilitation of articulatory motor cortex.
    Nuttall HE; Kennedy-Higgins D; Devlin JT; Adank P
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():13-22. PubMed ID: 27884757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the use of the distortion-sensitivity approach in examining the role of linguistic abilities in speech understanding in noise.
    Goverts ST; Huysmans E; Kramer SE; de Groot AM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1702-8. PubMed ID: 22180022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A measure for predicting audibility discrimination thresholds for spectral envelope distortions in vowel sounds.
    Rao P; van Dinther R; Veldhuis R; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2085-97. PubMed ID: 11386560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.