These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12942986)

  • 21. Auditory mismatch negativity: detecting spectral contrasts in a modulated noise.
    Stoody TM; Saoji AA; Atcherson SR
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Aug; 113(1):268-76. PubMed ID: 21987925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.
    Krull V; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 26458131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neural Segregation of Concurrent Speech: Effects of Background Noise and Reverberation on Auditory Scene Analysis in the Ventral Cochlear Nucleus.
    Sayles M; Stasiak A; Winter IM
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():389-397. PubMed ID: 27080680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
    Billings CJ; Penman TM; McMillan GP; Ellis EM
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Auditory steady state cortical responses indicate deviant phonemic-rate processing in adults with dyslexia.
    Poelmans H; Luts H; Vandermosten M; Boets B; Ghesquière P; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):134-43. PubMed ID: 21844810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using listening difficulty ratings of conditions for speech communication in rooms.
    Sato H; Bradley JS; Morimoto M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1157-67. PubMed ID: 15807005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speech-in-noise perception deficit in adults with dyslexia: effects of background type and listening configuration.
    Dole M; Hoen M; Meunier F
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun; 50(7):1543-52. PubMed ID: 22445915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Annoyance perception of sound and information extraction.
    Berglund B; Harder K; Preis A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1501-9. PubMed ID: 8176053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory processing disorder and speech perception problems in noise: finding the underlying origin.
    Lagacé J; Jutras B; Gagné JP
    Am J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 19(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 20308289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Rapid perceptual learning of noise-vocoded speech requires attention.
    Huyck JJ; Johnsrude IS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):EL236-42. PubMed ID: 22423814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Central, auditory mechanisms of perceptual compensation for spectral-envelope distortion.
    Watkins AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Dec; 90(6):2942-55. PubMed ID: 1787236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.
    Arehart K; Souza P; Kates J; Lunner T; Pedersen MS
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 25985016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of perceived spatial separation on informational masking of Chinese speech.
    Wu X; Wang C; Chen J; Qu H; Li W; Wu Y; Schneider BA; Li L
    Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 15574295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impaired auditory selective attention ameliorated by cognitive training with graded exposure to noise in patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Dundon NM; Dockree SP; Buckley V; Merriman N; Carton M; Clarke S; Roche RA; Lalor EC; Robertson IH; Dockree PM
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():74-87. PubMed ID: 26004059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory evoked potentials in females with high and low acceptance of background noise when listening to speech.
    Tampas JW; Harkrider AW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1548-61. PubMed ID: 16583900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An evaluation of the perceptual quality of phase-aware single-channel speech enhancement.
    Krawczyk-Becker M; Gerkmann T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):EL364. PubMed ID: 27794332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.