122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1294412)
1. Preoperative investigations for suspected pelvic masses.
Bostofte E; Larsen T; Torp-Pedersen S; Ottesen M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1992 Dec; 47(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 1294412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of the preoperative barium-enema examination in the assessment of pelvic masses.
Gedgaudas RK; Kelvin FM; Thompson WM; Rice RP
Radiology; 1983 Mar; 146(3):609-13. PubMed ID: 6828673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic value of pelvic examination, ultrasound, and serum CA 125 in postmenopausal women with a pelvic mass. An international multicenter study.
Schutter EM; Kenemans P; Sohn C; Kristen P; Crombach G; Westermann R; Môbus V; Kaufmann M; Caffier H; Schmidt-Rhode P
Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1398-406. PubMed ID: 8055463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography in the evaluation of gynecologic pelvic masses.
Walsh JW; Rosenfield AT; Jaffe CC; Schwartz PE; Simeone J; Dembner AG; Taylor KJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Dec; 131(6):955-60. PubMed ID: 104597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. B scan detection of pelvic masses: accuracy compared to the barium enema, intravenous pyelogram.
Hogan M; Srichomkuan A
J Clin Ultrasound; 1978 Apr; 6(2):103-4. PubMed ID: 96145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Barium enema examination in the evaluation of large pelvic masses.
Bryk D
Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1967 Dec; 101(4):970-7. PubMed ID: 6073392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective cross-validation of Doppler ultrasound examination and gray-scale ultrasound imaging for discrimination of benign and malignant pelvic masses.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 14(4):273-83. PubMed ID: 10586480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosis and treatment of enterovesical fistulae.
Pontari MA; McMillen MA; Garvey RH; Ballantyne GH
Am Surg; 1992 Apr; 58(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 1586086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of probability of malignancy using a logistic model combining physical examination, ultrasound, serum CA 125, and serum CA 72-4 in postmenopausal women with a pelvic mass: an international multicenter study.
Schutter EM; Sohn C; Kristen P; Möbus V; Crombach G; Kaufmann M; Caffier H; Kreienberg R; Verstraeten AA; Kenemans P
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Apr; 69(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 9570999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of preoperative investigations in patients admitted for ovarian primary cytoreductive surgery.
Guidozzi F; Sonnendecker EW
Gynecol Oncol; 1991 Mar; 40(3):244-7. PubMed ID: 2013447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?
Valentin L; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Metzger U; Lécuru F; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 16526098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound-based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group.
Timmerman D; Van Calster B; Testa AC; Guerriero S; Fischerova D; Lissoni AA; Van Holsbeke C; Fruscio R; Czekierdowski A; Jurkovic D; Savelli L; Vergote I; Bourne T; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Aug; 36(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 20455203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recurrent female pelvic cancer: assessment with transrectal ultrasonography.
Meanwell CA; Rolfe EB; Blackledge G; Docker MF; Lawton FG; Mould JJ
Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):278-81. PubMed ID: 3538149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffuse uterine leiomyomatosis with ovarian and parametrial involvement.
Robles-Frías A; Severín CE; Robles-Frías MJ; Garrido JL
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 97(5 Pt 2):834-5. PubMed ID: 11336772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnosis of gynecologic pelvic masses by CT scan (author's transl)].
Ito H; Kubo A; Takagi Y; Kinoshita H; Maekawa A; Okada K; Kamiyama I; Takeuchi H
Rinsho Hoshasen; 1981 May; 26(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 7277761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Pelvic gynecological cancers. Is hepatic echography useful?].
Bruneton JN; Raffaelli C; Balu-Maestro C; Marcy PY; Melia P
J Radiol; 1994 Mar; 75(3):191-3. PubMed ID: 8176678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors mimicking gynecological masses on ultrasound: a report of two cases.
Pinto V; Ingravallo G; Cicinelli E; Pintucci A; Sambati GS; Marinaccio M; D'Addario V
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 30(3):359-61. PubMed ID: 17721899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Role of Ca 125 in pelvic masses. Our experience].
Rotondi M; Lauro C; Ammaturo FP; Guerriero V; Rasile M; Panariello S
Minerva Ginecol; 2001 Feb; 53(1 Suppl 1):51-4. PubMed ID: 11526720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical significance of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of intrapelvic masses (author's transl)].
Kuroda T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1979 Aug; 39(8):821-39. PubMed ID: 503803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Transvaginal color Doppler and pelvic tumor vascularity: lessons learned and future challenges.
Kurjak A; Kupesic S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 6(2):145-59. PubMed ID: 8535919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
