246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12945051)
1. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.
Tsai J; Bonneau R; Morozov AV; Kuhlman B; Rohl CA; Baker D
Proteins; 2003 Oct; 53(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 12945051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
Hsieh MJ; Luo R
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hydrophobic potential of mean force as a solvation function for protein structure prediction.
Lin MS; Fawzi NL; Head-Gordon T
Structure; 2007 Jun; 15(6):727-40. PubMed ID: 17562319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrimination of native loop conformations in membrane proteins: decoy library design and evaluation of effective energy scoring functions.
Forrest LR; Woolf TB
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):492-509. PubMed ID: 12910450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating CASP4 predictions with physical energy functions.
Feig M; Brooks CL
Proteins; 2002 Nov; 49(2):232-45. PubMed ID: 12211003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protein refolding in silico with atom-based statistical potentials and conformational search using a simple genetic algorithm.
Fang Q; Shortle D
J Mol Biol; 2006 Jun; 359(5):1456-67. PubMed ID: 16678202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.
Dominy BN; Brooks CL
J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 11913380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Energy functions that discriminate X-ray and near native folds from well-constructed decoys.
Park B; Levitt M
J Mol Biol; 1996 May; 258(2):367-92. PubMed ID: 8627632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft energy function and generic evolutionary method for discriminating native from nonnative protein conformations.
Chiu YY; Hwang JK; Yang JM
J Comput Chem; 2008 Jul; 29(9):1364-73. PubMed ID: 18181137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Solvation parameters for predicting the structure of surface loops in proteins: transferability and entropic effects.
Das B; Meirovitch H
Proteins; 2003 May; 51(3):470-83. PubMed ID: 12696057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MOPED: method for optimizing physical energy parameters using decoys.
Seok C; Rosen JB; Chodera JD; Dill KA
J Comput Chem; 2003 Jan; 24(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 12483678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A continuum model for protein-protein interactions: application to the docking problem.
Jackson RM; Sternberg MJ
J Mol Biol; 1995 Jul; 250(2):258-75. PubMed ID: 7541840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model.
Lee MC; Duan Y
Proteins; 2004 May; 55(3):620-34. PubMed ID: 15103626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distance dependent centroid to centroid force fields using high resolution decoys.
Rajgaria R; McAllister SR; Floudas CA
Proteins; 2008 Feb; 70(3):950-70. PubMed ID: 17847088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Empirical solvation models can be used to differentiate native from near-native conformations of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor.
Vila J; Williams RL; Vásquez M; Scheraga HA
Proteins; 1991; 10(3):199-218. PubMed ID: 1715564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking.
Murphy J; Gatchell DW; Prasad JC; Vajda S
Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):840-54. PubMed ID: 14635126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
