BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12945920)

  • 1. Searching for nodules: what features attract attention and influence detection?
    Krupinski EA; Berger WG; Dallas WJ; Roehrig H
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Aug; 10(8):861-8. PubMed ID: 12945920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanism of satisfaction of search: eye position recordings in the reading of chest radiographs.
    Samuel S; Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Toto LC
    Radiology; 1995 Mar; 194(3):895-902. PubMed ID: 7862998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs.
    Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Meiss L; Peters-Bax L; Quekel LG; Snoeren MM; Tiehuis AM; Wittenberg R; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2399-405. PubMed ID: 24113431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computer-displayed eye position as a visual aid to pulmonary nodule interpretation.
    Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Krupinski EA
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Aug; 25(8):890-6. PubMed ID: 2394571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A perceptually based method for enhancing pulmonary nodule recognition.
    Krupinski EA; Nodine CF; Kundel HL
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Apr; 28(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 8478167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does Expectation of Abnormality Affect the Search Pattern of Radiologists When Looking for Pulmonary Nodules?
    Littlefair S; Brennan P; Reed W; Mello-Thoms C
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Feb; 30(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 27659798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subtle lung nodules: influence of local anatomic variations on detection.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ; Peterson E; Eyler WR
    Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 12750455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time-dependent observer errors in pulmonary nodule detection.
    Manning D; Barker-Mill SC; Donovan T; Crawford T
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Apr; 79(940):342-6. PubMed ID: 16585729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules.
    Kelcz F; Zink FE; Peppler WW; Kruger DG; Ergun DL; Mistretta CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):271-8. PubMed ID: 8310908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Searching for bone fractures: a comparison with pulmonary nodule search.
    Hu CH; Kundel HL; Nodine CF; Krupinski EA; Toto LC
    Acad Radiol; 1994 Sep; 1(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9419461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The solitary pulmonary nodule on chest radiography: can we really tell if the nodule is calcified?
    Berger WG; Erly WK; Krupinski EA; Standen JR; Stern RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Jan; 176(1):201-4. PubMed ID: 11133566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displays.
    Krupinski EA; Roehrig H
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jun; 9(6):638-45. PubMed ID: 12061737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital synthesis of lung nodules.
    Sherrier RH; Johnson GA; Suddarth SA; Chiles C; Hulka C; Ravin CE
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):933-7. PubMed ID: 3841098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method to determine the impact of reduced visual function on nodule detection performance.
    Thompson JD; Lança C; Lança L; Hogg P
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Feb; 23(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 28290335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of accuracy and precision of manual size measurements in chest tomosynthesis using simulated pulmonary nodules.
    Söderman C; Johnsson ÅA; Vikgren J; Norrlund RR; Molnar D; Svalkvist A; Månsson LG; Båth M
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 25601303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection of simulated lung nodules with computed radiography: effects of nodule size, local optical density, global object thickness, and exposure.
    Kimme-Smith C; Hart EM; Goldin JG; Johnson TD; Terwilliger R; Aberle DR
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Sep; 3(9):735-41. PubMed ID: 8883514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Visual Hindsight Bias on Radiologist Perception.
    Chen J; Littlefair S; Bourne R; Reed WM
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):977-984. PubMed ID: 31740289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual skill. Correlation with detection of solitary pulmonary nodules.
    Bass JC; Chiles C
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Sep; 25(9):994-8. PubMed ID: 2132306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation of radiologists' perception of lesion similarity: observations with paired breast masses on mammograms and paired lung nodules on CT images.
    Kumazawa S; Muramatsu C; Li Q; Li F; Shiraishi J; Caligiuri P; Schmidt RA; MacMahon H; Doi K
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):887-94. PubMed ID: 18572125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.