These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12945985)

  • 1. Comparisons of three alternative breast modalities in a common phantom imaging experiment.
    Li D; Meaney PM; Tosteson TD; Jiang S; Kerner TE; McBride TO; Pogue BW; Hartov A; Paulsen KD
    Med Phys; 2003 Aug; 30(8):2194-205. PubMed ID: 12945985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regional admittivity spectra with tomosynthesis images for breast cancer detection.
    Kao TJ; Boverman G; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC; Moore RH; Kopans DB
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007; 2007():4142-5. PubMed ID: 18002914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.
    Zhang Y; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wei J; Goodsitt MM; Hadjiiski LM; Ge J; Zhou C
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3781-95. PubMed ID: 17089843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multimodal Breast Phantoms for Microwave, Ultrasound, Mammography, Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Imaging.
    Ruvio G; Solimene R; Cuccaro A; Fiaschetti G; Fagan AJ; Cournane S; Cooke J; Ammann MJ; Tobon J; Browne JE
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32340281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a novel method of noise reduction using computer-simulated mammograms.
    Tischenko O; Hoeschen C; Dance DR; Hunt RA; Maidment AD; Bakic PR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):81-4. PubMed ID: 15933085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visibility of simulated microcalcifications--a hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems.
    Lai CJ; Shaw CC; Whitman GJ; Johnston DA; Yang WT; Selinko V; Arribas E; Dogan B; Kappadath SC
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):182-94. PubMed ID: 15719969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regional admittivity spectra with tomosynthesis images for breast cancer detection: preliminary patient study.
    Kao TJ; Boverman G; Kim BS; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC; Choi MH; Moore RH; Kopans DB
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Dec; 27(12):1762-8. PubMed ID: 19033092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions.
    Chan HP; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski LM; Lydick JT; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Nees A; Blane CE; Sahiner B
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1001-9. PubMed ID: 15895583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
    Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
    Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A reconstruction algorithm for breast cancer imaging with electrical impedance tomography in mammography geometry.
    Choi MH; Kao TJ; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Newell JC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Apr; 54(4):700-10. PubMed ID: 17405377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional quantitative microwave imaging of realistic numerical breast phantoms using Huber regularization.
    Bai F; Franchois A; De Zaeytijd J; Pižurica A
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():5135-8. PubMed ID: 24110891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis.
    Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The complete electrode model for EIT in a mammography geometry.
    Kim BS; Boverman G; Newell JC; Saulnier GJ; Isaacson D
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S57-69. PubMed ID: 17664648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Method of measuring NEQ as a quality control metric for digital mammography.
    Bloomquist AK; Mainprize JG; Mawdsley GE; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031905. PubMed ID: 24593723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of back projection methods for breast tomosynthesis image reconstruction.
    Zhou W; Lu J; Zhou O; Chen Y
    J Digit Imaging; 2015 Jun; 28(3):338-45. PubMed ID: 25384538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of non-uniform breast phantom and its microwave imaging for tumor detection by CP-MCT.
    Miyakawa M; Takata S; Inotsume K
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():2723-6. PubMed ID: 19964041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
    Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.