716 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12946067)
1. Anaerobic microflora under Class I and Class II composite and amalgam restorations.
Splieth C; Bernhardt O; Heinrich A; Bernhardt H; Meyer G
Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 12946067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial composition and red fluorescence of plaque in relation to primary and secondary caries next to composite: an in situ study.
Thomas RZ; van der Mei HC; van der Veen MH; de Soet JJ; Huysmans MC
Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2008 Feb; 23(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 18173792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study.
Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L
Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
J Dent Res; 2010 Oct; 89(10):1063-7. PubMed ID: 20660797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries.
Mjör IA
Quintessence Int; 1998 May; 29(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 9693650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of secondary caries around tooth-colored restorations: a clinical and microbiological study.
Kidd EA; Beighton D
J Dent Res; 1996 Dec; 75(12):1942-6. PubMed ID: 9033448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of pre- and postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of amalgam and composite restorations.
Ulukapi H; Benderli Y; Ulukapi I
Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 12946068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
Sarrett DC
Dent Mater; 2005 Jan; 21(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 15680997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations.
Wiegand A; Attin T
Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1461-7. PubMed ID: 17320944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal ditching and staining as a predictor of secondary caries around amalgam restorations: a clinical and microbiological study.
Kidd EA; Joyston-Bechal S; Beighton D
J Dent Res; 1995 May; 74(5):1206-11. PubMed ID: 7540634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants.
Martin J; Fernandez E; Estay J; Gordan VV; Mjor IA; Moncada G
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22788726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo.
Spreafico RC; Krejci I; Dietschi D
J Dent; 2005 Jul; 33(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 15935270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early failure of Class II resin composite versus Class II amalgam restorations placed by dental students.
Overton JD; Sullivan DJ
J Dent Educ; 2012 Mar; 76(3):338-40. PubMed ID: 22383602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students.
Opdam NJ; Loomans BA; Roeters FJ; Bronkhorst EM
J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 15193786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
Baratieri LN; Machado A; Van Noort R; Ritter AV; Baratieri NM
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reasons for replacement of Class II amalgam restorations in private practice.
Allander L; Birkhed D; Bratthall D
Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 2255996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
