These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12946072)

  • 1. Comparison of two methods for the removal of root canal posts.
    Chandler NP; Qualtrough AJ; Purton DG
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):534-6. PubMed ID: 12946072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of ultrasonic vibration and various sealer and cement combinations on titanium post removal.
    Bergeron BE; Murchison DF; Schindler WG; Walker WA
    J Endod; 2001 Jan; 27(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11487157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal time of fiber posts versus titanium posts.
    Frazer RQ; Kovarik RE; Chance KB; Mitchell RJ
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 18686770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of several protocols for the application of ultrasound during the removal of cast intraradicular posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement.
    Garrido AD; Oliveira AG; Osório JE; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 19467051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on the retention of adhesively luted intra-radicular posts.
    Satterthwaite JD; Stokes AN
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Sep; 12(3):101-4. PubMed ID: 15521391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
    Balbosh A; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars.
    Bolhuis P; de Gee A; Feilzer A
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Sep; 35(8):657-67. PubMed ID: 15366533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two techniques for removing fiber posts.
    Gesi A; Magnolfi S; Goracci C; Ferrari M
    J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):580-2. PubMed ID: 14503831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of the effect of ultrasound on the removal of intracanal posts.
    Braga NM; Resende LM; Vasconcellos WA; Paulino SM; Sousa-Neto MD
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(5):492-5. PubMed ID: 19903640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of ultrasound, with and without water spray cooling, on removal of posts cemented with resin or zinc phosphate cements.
    Garrido AD; Fonseca TS; Alfredo E; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Endod; 2004 Mar; 30(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15055437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the survival of fibre posts cemented with two different composite resin systems.
    Mehta SB; Millar BJ
    Br Dent J; 2008 Dec; 205(11):E23. PubMed ID: 19029918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on post removal in extracted human premolar teeth.
    Johnson WT; Leary JM; Boyer DB
    J Endod; 1996 Sep; 22(9):487-8. PubMed ID: 9198432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
    Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Various conditioning methods for root canals influencing the tensile strength of titanium posts.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Nergiz I; Ozcan M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 31(9):890-4. PubMed ID: 15369471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing the removal of posts.
    Hauman CH; Chandler NP; Purton DG
    Int Endod J; 2003 Oct; 36(10):687-90. PubMed ID: 14511226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of timing of coronal preparation on retention of two types of post cores.
    Saygili G; Sahmali S; Demirel F
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 18578178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the retention of tooth-colored posts.
    Qualtrough AJ; Chandler NP; Purton DG
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Mar; 34(3):199-201. PubMed ID: 12731601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.