These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12946563)

  • 21. Grasping actions remap peripersonal space.
    Brozzoli C; Pavani F; Urquizar C; Cardinali L; Farnè A
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jul; 20(10):913-7. PubMed ID: 19512951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control both the direction and distance of pointing movements.
    Saunders JA; Knill DC
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 May; 162(4):458-73. PubMed ID: 15754182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On-line feedback control of human visually guided slow ramp tracking: effects of spatial separation of visual cues.
    Reed DW; Liu X; Miall RC
    Neurosci Lett; 2003 Mar; 338(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 12581833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. No evidence of a lower visual field specialization for visuomotor control.
    Binsted G; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 162(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 15517212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How active gaze informs the hand in sequential pointing movements.
    Wilmut K; Wann JP; Brown JH
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 175(4):654-66. PubMed ID: 16794847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The utilization of visual feedback in the control of movement direction: evidence from a video aiming task.
    Khan MA; Lawrence GP; Franks IM; Elliott D
    Motor Control; 2003 Jul; 7(3):290-303. PubMed ID: 12893959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On-line vs. off-line utilization of peripheral visual afferent information to ensure spatial accuracy of goal-directed movements.
    Bédard P; Proteau L
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 15029468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visual proprioception in the timing of movements: evidence from deafferentation.
    Stenneken P; Prinz W; Bosbach S; Aschersleben G
    Neuroreport; 2006 Apr; 17(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 16543823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intercepting a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude.
    Tresilian JR; Lonergan A
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jan; 142(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 11807574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Suboptimal online control of aiming movements in virtual contexts.
    Veilleux LN; Proteau L
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 208(3):345-58. PubMed ID: 21082310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Visual information throughout a reach determines endpoint precision.
    Ma-Wyatt A; McKee SP
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 May; 179(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 17109109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of speeds and force fields on submovements during circular manual tracking in humans.
    Pasalar S; Roitman AV; Ebner TJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 May; 163(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 15668793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The use of visual feedback is independent of visual awareness: evidence from visual extinction.
    Schenk T; Schindler I; McIntosh RD; Milner AD
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 167(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 16034576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Complementary spatial and timing control in rhythmic arm movements.
    Nickl RW; Ankarali MM; Cowan NJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Apr; 121(4):1543-1560. PubMed ID: 30811263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Extending Fitts' Law to manual obstacle avoidance.
    Jax SA; Rosenbaum DA; Vaughan J
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 17562027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The supplementation of spatial information improves coordination.
    Armstrong A; Issartel J; Varlet M; Marin L
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Aug; 548():212-6. PubMed ID: 23701861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictive strategies in interception tasks: differences between eye and hand movements.
    Eggert T; Rivas F; Straube A
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 15551090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Delayed grasping of a Müller-Lyer figure.
    Westwood DA; McEachern T; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Nov; 141(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 11713628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Randomizing visual feedback in manual aiming: reminiscence of the previous trial condition and prior knowledge of feedback availability.
    Cheng DT; Luis M; Tremblay L
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 189(4):403-10. PubMed ID: 18560814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conditions for interference versus facilitation during sequential sensorimotor adaptation.
    Bock O; Schneider S; Bloomberg J
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Jun; 138(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 11460774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.