These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12946664)
1. Can monocortical miniplates provide bony compression?. An experimental model. Kerawala CJ; Allan W; Williams ED Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 41(4):232-5. PubMed ID: 12946664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of monocortical miniplates for the intraoral treatment of mandibular fractures. Chiodo TA; Milles M Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2009 Mar; 17(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 19237124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model. Shetty V; McBrearty D; Fourney M; Caputo AA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Jul; 53(7):791-801; discussion 801-2. PubMed ID: 7595794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro evaluation of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1109-14. PubMed ID: 20655176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A biomechanical evaluation of plating techniques used for reconstructing mandibular symphysis/parasymphysis fractures. Madsen MJ; McDaniel CA; Haug RH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2012-9. PubMed ID: 18848096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro study of the effect of bony buttressing on fixation strength of a fractured atrophic edentulous mandible model. Sikes JW; Smith BR; Mukherjee DP J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 58(1):56-61; discussion 62. PubMed ID: 10632166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of different types of rigid internal fixation techniques for subcondylar fractures. Tominaga K; Habu M; Khanal A; Mimori Y; Yoshioka I; Fukuda J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1510-6. PubMed ID: 16982310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fracture healing and subimplant bone response following fixation with a locking miniplate and screw system for mandibular angle fractures in a sheep model. Poon CC; Verco S Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):736-45. PubMed ID: 23374732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of the number of screws on the stability of locking mandibular reconstruction plates. Pereira-Filho VA; da Silva BN; Nunes Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Real Gabrielli MF; Monnazzi MS Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 42(6):732-5. PubMed ID: 23528747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of miniplate versus lag-screw osteosynthesis for fractures of the mandibular angle. Schaaf H; Kaubruegge S; Streckbein P; Wilbrand JF; Kerkmann H; Howaldt HP Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Jan; 111(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 20598593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of two miniplates to achieve intraoperative maxillomandibular fixation. Rai A; Jain A; Rasal S J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 118(5):289-290. PubMed ID: 28684337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative biomechanical study on three miniplates osteosynthesis systems for stabilisation of low condylar fractures of the mandible. Hakim SG; Wolf M; Wendlandt R; Kimmerle H; Sieg P; Jacobsen HC Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 24629455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of plating techniques for fractures of the mandibular condyle. Alkan A; Metin M; Muğlali M; Ozden B; Celebi N Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16777278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of stability of titanium and absorbable plate and screw fixation for mandibular angle fractures. Esen A; Ataoğlu H; Gemi L Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 18718777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates. Haug RH; Street CC; Goltz M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 60(11):1319-26. PubMed ID: 12420268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of titanium and biodegradable miniplates for fixation of mandibular fractures. Lee HB; Oh JS; Kim SG; Kim HK; Moon SY; Kim YK; Yun PY; Son JS J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 68(9):2065-9. PubMed ID: 20096981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A meta-analysis comparing the 2.0-mm locking plate system with the 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system in treatment of mandible fractures. Zhan S; Jiang Y; Cheng Z; Ye J J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2094-7. PubMed ID: 25304139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy: a comparison of lag screw fixation versus miniplates with monocortical screw technique. Becktor JP; Rebellato J; Sollenius O; Vedtofte P; Isaksson S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 66(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 18083423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]