These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12946920)

  • 21. Comparing diagnostic validity of the TAT and a new picture projective test.
    Sharkey KJ; Ritzler BA
    J Pers Assess; 1985 Aug; 49(4):406-12. PubMed ID: 3900331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Defense Mechanism Card Pull in TAT Stories.
    Cramer P
    J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 27484927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of the TAT in the assessment of DSM-IV cluster B personality disorders.
    Ackerman SJ; Clemence AJ; Weatherill R; Hilsenroth MJ
    J Pers Assess; 1999 Dec; 73(3):422-48. PubMed ID: 10689653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quantitative studies of responses elicited by selected TAT cards.
    Ehrenreich JH
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Aug; 67(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 2236393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Uniqueness of certain structural personality prerequisites in schizophrenia].
    Kontridze FM; Mestiashvili MG; Puladze SV
    Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1975; 75(9):1365-8. PubMed ID: 1179898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sociotropy and autonomy: preliminary evidence for construct validity using TAT narratives.
    Kwon P; Campbell DG; Williams MG
    J Pers Assess; 2001 Aug; 77(1):128-38. PubMed ID: 11562098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Self psychology interpretation of the Thematic Apperception Test.
    Benziman H; Perlow M
    Bull Menninger Clin; 1999; 63(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 10028749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative study of a series of TAT and CAT cards.
    LIGHT BH
    J Clin Psychol; 1954 Apr; 10(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 13143129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Personal problem-solving system for scoring TAT responses: preliminary validity and reliability data.
    Ronan GF; Colavito VA; Hammontree SR
    J Pers Assess; 1993 Aug; 61(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 16370797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Thematic Apperception Test: psychodiagnosis in heroin-dependent patients].
    Cabal Bravo JC; Bobes García J; Vázquez Fernández A; González-Quirós Corujo P; Bousoño García M; García Prieto A; González García-Portilla P
    Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines; 1990; 18(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 2184640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Children's Apperception Test: possible applications for adults.
    Kitron DG; Benziman H
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1990; 27(1):29-47. PubMed ID: 2365582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Personal problem-solving scoring of the TAT: sensitivity to training.
    Roman GF; Date AL; Weisbrod M
    J Pers Assess; 1995 Feb; 64(1):119-31. PubMed ID: 16367735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of the personality of runaway girls with a control group as expressed in the themas of Murray's thematic apperception test.
    GOTHBERG LC
    Am J Ment Defic; 1947 Apr; 51(4):627-31. PubMed ID: 20267772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Henry A. Murray: an appreciation.
    BELLAK L
    J Proj Tech; 1958 Jun; 22(2):143. PubMed ID: 13550260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The relationship between behavioral indices of aggression and hostile content on the TAT.
    Matranga JT
    J Pers Assess; 1976 Apr; 40(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 957083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The metamorphosis of projective methods.
    Klopfer WG
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Oct; 32(5):402-4. PubMed ID: 4879248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. TAT results in a longitudinal study of bereaved college students.
    Balk DE; Lampe S; Sharpe B; Schwinn S; Holen K; Cook L; Dubois R
    Death Stud; 1998; 22(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 10179832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sex differences, sex roles, and projection on the TAT: matching stimulus to examinee gender.
    Katz HE; Russ SW; Overholser JC
    J Pers Assess; 1993 Feb; 60(1):186-91. PubMed ID: 8433266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Associative elaboration and integration scales for evaluating TAT protocols.
    Slemon AG; Holzwarth EJ; Lewis J
    J Pers Assess; 1976 Aug; 40(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 957086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of social class of subjects on normative responses to TAT cards.
    Ehrenreich JH
    J Clin Psychol; 1990 Jul; 46(4):467-71. PubMed ID: 2212051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.