BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12947329)

  • 21. Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice.
    Kraemer HC; Kupfer DJ
    Biol Psychiatry; 2006 Jun; 59(11):990-6. PubMed ID: 16368078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation.
    Malik M; Hnatkova K; Batchvarov V; Gang Y; Smetana P; Camm AJ
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Dec; 27(12):1659-69. PubMed ID: 15613131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Type II error and statistical power in reports of small animal clinical trials.
    Giuffrida MA
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2014 May; 244(9):1075-80. PubMed ID: 24739118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consultants' forum: should post hoc sample size calculations be done?
    Walters SJ
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18416448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sample-size calculations for studies with correlated ordinal outcomes.
    Kim HY; Williamson JM; Lyles CM
    Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):2977-87. PubMed ID: 16149125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Seven ways to increase power without increasing N.
    Hansen WB; Collins LM
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1994; 142():184-95. PubMed ID: 9243537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The problem of the type II statistical error.
    Mittendorf R; Arun V; Sapugay AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 86(5):857-9. PubMed ID: 7566865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The value of RCT evidence depends on the quality of statistical analysis.
    Faulkner C; Fidler F; Cumming G
    Behav Res Ther; 2008 Feb; 46(2):270-81. PubMed ID: 18191102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sample size and statistical power in the small-animal analgesia literature.
    Hofmeister EH; King J; Read MR; Budsberg SC
    J Small Anim Pract; 2007 Feb; 48(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 17286659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sample size calculations in orthopaedics randomised controlled trials: revisiting research practices.
    Sabharwal S; Patel NK; Holloway I; Athanasiou T
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Mar; 81(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 26280864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determining sample size and power in clinical trials: the forgotten essential.
    Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    Semin Reprod Endocrinol; 1996 May; 14(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 8796935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is There Truly "No Significant Difference"? Underpowered Randomized Controlled Trials in the Orthopaedic Literature.
    Abdullah L; Davis DE; Fabricant PD; Baldwin K; Namdari S
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Dec; 97(24):2068-73. PubMed ID: 26677241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data.
    Jung SH; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1305-15. PubMed ID: 12687656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sample size of randomized double-blind trials 1976-1991.
    Mulward S; Gotzsche PC
    Dan Med Bull; 1996 Feb; 43(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 8906985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Caution regarding the choice of standard deviations to guide sample size calculations in clinical trials.
    Chen H; Zhang N; Lu X; Chen S
    Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 23794405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Statistical reporting in randomized controlled trials from the dermatology literature: a review of 44 dermatology journals.
    McClean M; Silverberg JI
    Br J Dermatol; 2015 Jul; 173(1):172-83. PubMed ID: 25989239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls.
    Noordzij M; Tripepi G; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Tanck MW; Jager KJ
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2010 May; 25(5):1388-93. PubMed ID: 20067907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Statistical sampling and hypothesis testing in orthopaedic research.
    Bernstein J; McGuire K; Freedman KB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):55-62. PubMed ID: 12897596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mid-course sample size modification in clinical trials based on the observed treatment effect.
    Jennison C; Turnbull BW
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):971-93. PubMed ID: 12627413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. To increase power in randomized clinical trials without increasing sample size.
    Kraemer HC
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1991; 27(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 1775591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.