These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12947355)

  • 1. Active-control clinical trials to establish equivalence or noninferiority: methodological and statistical concepts linked to quality.
    Gomberg-Maitland M; Frison L; Halperin JL
    Am Heart J; 2003 Sep; 146(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 12947355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials.
    Christensen E
    J Hepatol; 2007 May; 46(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 17412447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equivalence trials: methodologic analysis.
    Carneiro A
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1125-39. PubMed ID: 14655314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
    Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Placebo or active control trials of antipsychotic drugs?
    Fleischhacker WW; Czobor P; Hummer M; Kemmler G; Kohnen R; Volavka J
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2003 May; 60(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 12742866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential designs for equivalence studies.
    Whitehead J
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2703-15. PubMed ID: 8981681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Active-controlled, non-inferiority trials in oncology: arbitrary limits, infeasible sample sizes and uninformative data analysis. is there another way?
    Carroll KJ
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 17128427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized clinical trial design for assessing noninferiority when superiority is expected.
    Freidlin B; Korn EL; George SL; Gray R
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Nov; 25(31):5019-23. PubMed ID: 17971602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of preservation of the ethical principle of equipoise in the design of clinical trials: relative impact of the methodological quality domains on the treatment effect in randomized controlled trials.
    Djulbegovic B; Cantor A; Clarke M
    Account Res; 2003; 10(4):301-15. PubMed ID: 14989285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Controlled randomized clinical trials].
    Jaillon P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8. PubMed ID: 18225427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Methods in equivalence and non-inferiority trials].
    Christensen E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Sep; 170(38):2977-9. PubMed ID: 18808753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Similar, the same or just not different: a guide for deciding whether treatments are clinically equivalent. [Dept. of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Univ. of Western Ontario, London, Ontario].
    Massel D
    Can J Cardiol; 1999 May; 15(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 10350665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice of delta noninferiority margin and dependency of the noninferiority trials.
    Tsong Y; Zhang J; Levenson M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 17365224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noninferiority testing beyond simple two-sample comparison.
    Tsong Y; Chen WJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(2):289-308. PubMed ID: 17365225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomization as a basis for inference in noninferiority trials.
    Wiens BL
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 17128425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision-theoretic views on simultaneous testing of superiority and noninferiority.
    Koyama T; Westfall PH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):943-55. PubMed ID: 16279353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials.
    Le Henanff A; Giraudeau B; Baron G; Ravaud P
    JAMA; 2006 Mar; 295(10):1147-51. PubMed ID: 16522835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A unifying approach to non-inferiority, equivalence and superiority tests via multiple decision processes.
    Hirotsu C
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 17879327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The importance of equivalence trials in showing the usefulness of treatments].
    Hermens ML; van Hout HP; Terluin B; Adèr HJ; de Haan M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(44):2162-6. PubMed ID: 14626832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.