86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12948273)
21. Pelvic examination, transvaginal ultrasound and transvaginal color Doppler sonography as predictors of ovarian cancer.
Buckshee K; Temsu I; Bhatla N; Deka D
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Apr; 61(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9622173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using an artificial neural network.
Tailor A; Jurkovic D; Bourne TH; Collins WP; Campbell S
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Jan; 106(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 10426255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A multivariate logistic regression analysis in predicting malignancy for patients with ovarian tumors.
Hata K; Akiba S; Hata T; Miyazaki K
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Mar; 68(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 9570977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Artificial neural network models for the preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses.
Timmerman D; Verrelst H; Bourne TH; De Moor B; Collins WP; Vergote I; Vandewalle J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 13(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 10201082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone.
Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Hugol D; Hassen K; Sciot C; Truc JB; Poitout P; Vadrot D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8553953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Combined transvaginal B-mode and color Doppler sonography for differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: results of a multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Schelling M; Braun M; Kuhn W; Bogner G; Gruber R; Gnirs J; Schneider KT; Ulm K; Rutke S; Staudach A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 10739694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features.
Brown DL; Doubilet PM; Miller FH; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Benson CB; Lerner MH
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 9646799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pattern recognition of pelvic masses by gray-scale ultrasound imaging: the contribution of Doppler ultrasound.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 14(5):338-47. PubMed ID: 10623994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ovarian cysts: indications, pertinence and diagnostic criteria].
Marret H
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2001 Nov; 30(1 Suppl):S20-33. PubMed ID: 11917373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Flow characteristics in benign and malignant gynecologic tumors using transvaginal color flow Doppler.
Carter J; Saltzman A; Hartenbach E; Fowler J; Carson L; Twiggs LB
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jan; 83(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 8272293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination, and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Feb; 15(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 10775998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An improved risk of malignancy index in diagnosis of adnexal mass.
Wang LM; Song H; Song X; Zhou XB
Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Feb; 125(3):533-5. PubMed ID: 22490416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of adnexal masses with three-dimensional ultrasonography.
Geomini PM; Kluivers KB; Moret E; Bremer GL; Kruitwagen RF; Mol BW
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1167-75. PubMed ID: 17077239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses.
Marret H; Sauget S; Giraudeau B; Body G; Tranquart F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 25(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 15846763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A critical analysis of Doppler velocimetry in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign ovarian masses.
Marchesini AC; Magrio FA; Berezowski AT; Neto OB; Nogueira AA; Candido dos Reis FJ
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2008; 17(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 18240986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A nomogram for estimating the probability of ovarian cancer.
Lachance JA; Choudhri AF; Sarti M; Modesitt SC; Jazaeri AA; Stukenborg GJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 21269667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Ovarian masses: can benign and malignant lesions be differentiated with color and pulsed Doppler US?
Brown DL; Frates MC; Laing FC; DiSalvo DN; Doubilet PM; Benson CB; Waitzkin ED; Muto MG
Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):333-6. PubMed ID: 8284377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography in the presurgical characterization of adnexal masses.
Caruso A; Caforio L; Testa AC; Ciampelli M; Panici PB; Mancuso S
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Nov; 63(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 8910625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is three-dimensional ultrasonography of additional value in the assessment of adnexal masses?
Geomini PM; Coppus SF; Kluivers KB; Bremer GL; Kruitwagen RF; Mol BW
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jul; 106(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 17493667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
