BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12948557)

  • 1. Design, construction and mechanical optimisation process of electrode with radial current flow in the scala tympani.
    Deman PR; Kaiser TM; Dirckx JJ; Offeciers FE; Peeters SA
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Sep; 128(1-2):143-50. PubMed ID: 12948557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach.
    Briaire JJ; Frijns JH
    Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 214(1-2):17-27. PubMed ID: 16520009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory prosthesis with a penetrating nerve array.
    Middlebrooks JC; Snyder RL
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 8(2):258-79. PubMed ID: 17265124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation I: comparison of scala tympani and intrameatal electrode responses.
    Cartee LA; Miller CA; van den Honert C
    Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):10-21. PubMed ID: 16624511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current distributions in cochlear stimulation.
    Black RC; Clark GM; Tong YC; Patrick JF
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():137-45. PubMed ID: 6575639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrical impedance measurements of cochlear structures using the four-electrode reflection-coefficient technique.
    Kumar G; Chokshi M; Richter CP
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):86-94. PubMed ID: 19857561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear or nerve stimulation.
    White RL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1987 Jan; 10(1 Pt 2):232-6. PubMed ID: 2436184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protocol for determining the auditory percepts of electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    Michelson RP; Schubert E; Walsh S; White M
    Laryngoscope; 1979 May; 89(5 Pt 1):748-51. PubMed ID: 449518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design and fabrication of multichannel cochlear implants for animal research.
    Rebscher SJ; Hetherington AM; Snyder RL; Leake PA; Bonham BH
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17727956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current distributions produced inside and outside the cochlea from a scala tympani electrode array.
    Ifukube T; White RL
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1987 Nov; 34(11):883-90. PubMed ID: 3692506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biophysical measurements in the implanted cochlea.
    Spelman FA; Pfingst BE; Miller JM; Hassul M; Powers WE; Clopton BM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1980; 88(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 6773014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An eight channel scala tympani electrode for auditory prostheses.
    Hochmair-Desoyer I; Hochmair ES
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1980 Jan; 27(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 6892626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.
    Spelman FA; Clopton BM; Pfingst BE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():3-8. PubMed ID: 6814331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impedance Changes and Fibrous Tissue Growth after Cochlear Implantation Are Correlated and Can Be Reduced Using a Dexamethasone Eluting Electrode.
    Wilk M; Hessler R; Mugridge K; Jolly C; Fehr M; Lenarz T; Scheper V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147552. PubMed ID: 26840740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds.
    Beitel RE; Snyder RL; Schreiner CE; Raggio MW; Leake PA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Apr; 83(4):2145-62. PubMed ID: 10758124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Basic fitting and evaluation parameters of a newly designed cochlear implant electrode.
    Deman PR; Daemers K; Yperman M; Offeciers FE; Plasmans A; Van Dijk B; Govaerts PJ
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Apr; 124(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 15141756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
    Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
    Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Impedance of cochlear implant electrode array in scalae tympani].
    Du Q; Wang ZM
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Dec; 88(46):3302-4. PubMed ID: 19159560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium.
    Tona Y; Inaoka T; Ito J; Kawano S; Nakagawa T
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.