BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12948557)

  • 21. [Determinants of the effectiveness of cochlear implants: I. Placement in the cochlea].
    Kral A; Hartmann R; Klinke R
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000; 101(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 11039219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implant surgery.
    Gstoettner WK; Adunka O; Franz P; Hamzavi J; Plenk H; Susani M; Baumgartner W; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2001 Jan; 121(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 11349782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigations towards an artificial cochlea.
    Hochmair ES; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Burian K
    Int J Artif Organs; 1979 Sep; 2(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 582589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The internal dimensions of the cochlear scalae with special reference to cochlear electrode insertion trauma.
    Biedron S; Prescher A; Ilgner J; Westhofen M
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jul; 31(5):731-7. PubMed ID: 20142798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cochlear pathology with chronically implanted scala tympani electrodes.
    Leake-Jones PA; Rebscher SJ
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():203-23. PubMed ID: 6575646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A multichannel scala tympani electrode array incorporating a drug delivery system for chronic intracochlear infusion.
    Shepherd RK; Xu J
    Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 172(1-2):92-8. PubMed ID: 12361871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
    Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditory responses of field L to electrical stimulation.
    Lim D; Oh S; Chang SO; Kim CS
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000; 57():15-7. PubMed ID: 11892132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of a new mid-scala cochlear implant electrode using microcomputed tomography.
    Frisch CD; Carlson ML; Lane JI; Driscoll CL
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Dec; 125(12):2778-83. PubMed ID: 25946683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The facial nerve canal: an important cochlear conduction path revealed by Clarion electrical field imaging.
    Vanpoucke F; Zarowski A; Casselman J; Frijns J; Peeters S
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 May; 25(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 15129106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cochlear implant and inflammation reaction: Safety study of a new steroid-eluting electrode.
    Astolfi L; Simoni E; Giarbini N; Giordano P; Pannella M; Hatzopoulos S; Martini A
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():44-52. PubMed ID: 27109196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve using high surface area (HiQ) platinum electrodes.
    Tykocinski M; Duan Y; Tabor B; Cowan RS
    Hear Res; 2001 Sep; 159(1-2):53-68. PubMed ID: 11520634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Current distributions in the cat cochlea: a modelling and electrophysiological study.
    O'Leary SJ; Black RC; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 3840160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulation of the facial nerve by intracochlear electrodes in otosclerosis: a computer modeling study.
    Frijns JH; Kalkman RK; Briaire JJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Dec; 30(8):1168-74. PubMed ID: 19574948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Lehnert T; Gstoettner W
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jul; 114(7):1237-41. PubMed ID: 15235353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Evaluation of an electrode design for the combined electric-acoustic stimulation].
    Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Radeloff A; Lehnert T; Gstöttner W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Oct; 83(10):653-8. PubMed ID: 15476137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Percepts from modiolar (eighth nerve) stimulation.
    Simmons FB
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():259-63. PubMed ID: 6575649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Change in endocochlear potential during experimental insertion of a simulated cochlear implant electrode in the guinea pig.
    Oshima H; Ikeda R; Nomura K; Yamazaki M; Hidaka H; Katori Y; Oshima T; Kawase T; Kobayashi T
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 24448282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Atraumaticity study of 2 cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Manrique M; Picciafuoco S; Manrique R; Sanhueza I; Domínguez P; Pérez N; Zubieta JL; de Abajo J
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):619-28. PubMed ID: 24569795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
    Shepherd RK; Matsushima J; Martin RL; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.