These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12948557)

  • 41. Round window membrane insertion with perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Coordes A; Ernst A; Brademann G; Todt I
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1027-32. PubMed ID: 23507991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In vitro modifications of the scala tympani environment and the cochlear implant array surface.
    Kontorinis G; Scheper V; Wissel K; Stöver T; Lenarz T; Paasche G
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):2057-63. PubMed ID: 22648595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Fabrication and evaluation of an improved polymer-based cochlear electrode array for atraumatic insertion.
    Gwon TM; Min KS; Kim JH; Oh SH; Lee HS; Park MH; Kim SJ
    Biomed Microdevices; 2015 Apr; 17(2):32. PubMed ID: 25681972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A transparent model of the human scala tympani cavity.
    Rebscher SJ; Talbot N; Bruszewski W; Heilmann M; Brasell J; Merzenich MM
    J Neurosci Methods; 1996 Jan; 64(1):105-14. PubMed ID: 8869490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Pitch correlates of direct auditory nerve electrical stimulation.
    Simmons FB; White RL; Walker MG; Mathews RG
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1981; 90(2 Pt 3):15-8. PubMed ID: 6784645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Would an endosteal CI-electrode make sense? Comparison of the auditory nerve excitability from different stimulation sites using ESRT measurements and mathematical models.
    Pau HW; Grünbaum A; Ehrt K; Dahl R; Just T; van Rienen U
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jun; 271(6):1375-81. PubMed ID: 23657576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Impedance between modiolus and different walls of scala tympani].
    Du Q; Wang Z
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 22(19):878-9. PubMed ID: 19160859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of electrical current configuration on potential fields in the electrically stimulated cochlea: field models and measurements.
    Spelman FA; Pfingst BE; Clopton BM; Jolly CN; Rodenhiser KL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():131-6. PubMed ID: 7668604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Multichannel cochlear implantation in the scala vestibuli.
    Lin K; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 16788421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of half-band and full-band electrodes for intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Xu SA; McAnally KI; Xu J; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 May; 102(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8489166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
    Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Psychophysical evaluation of cochlear prostheses in a monkey model.
    Pfingst BE; Donaldson JA; Miller JM; Spelman FA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1979; 88(5 Pt 1):613-25. PubMed ID: 115356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [The location of inserting the electrode into the cochlear].
    Zhang DX
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 May; 14(5):195-6. PubMed ID: 12541539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode.
    Aschendorff A; Briggs R; Brademann G; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):169-179. PubMed ID: 29059669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Radial current flow and source density in the basal scala tympani.
    Garcia P; Clopton BM
    Hear Res; 1987 Nov; 31(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 3429349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A cochlear implant electrode.
    Clark GM; Hallworth RJ; Zdanius K
    J Laryngol Otol; 1975 Aug; 89(8):787-92. PubMed ID: 1185061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cochleotopic selectivity of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array using the 2-deoxyglucose technique.
    Brown M; Shepherd RK; Webster WR; Martin RL; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1992 May; 59(2):224-40. PubMed ID: 1618713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque.
    Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Xu SA; Pyman BC
    Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 8572119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Percepts from scala tympani stimulation.
    Tong YC; Clark GM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():264-7. PubMed ID: 6575650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.