These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12948557)

  • 61. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.
    Mitchell A; Miller JM; Finger PA; Heller JW; Raphael Y; Altschuler RA
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):30-43. PubMed ID: 9083802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Intraoperative Electrophysiologic Variations Caused by the Scalar Position of Cochlear Implant Electrodes.
    Mittmann P; Ernst A; Todt I
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 25730445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Elimination of facial nerve stimulation by reimplantation in cochlear implant subjects.
    Battmer R; Pesch J; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz M; Lenarz T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Oct; 27(7):918-22. PubMed ID: 17006341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Design and fabrication of multiwire scala tympani electrodes.
    Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Hochmair ES; Burian K
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1983; 405():173-82. PubMed ID: 6575641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.
    Boyer E; Karkas A; Attye A; Lefournier V; Escude B; Schmerber S
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 25575374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Implanted material tolerance studies for a multiple-channel cochlear prosthesis.
    Shepherd RK; Webb RL; Clark GM; Pyman BC; Hirshorn MS; Murray MT; Houghton ME
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():71-81. PubMed ID: 6441446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.
    Boëx C; Baud L; Cosendai G; Sigrist A; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens.
    Ni D; Shepherd RK; Seldon HL; Xu SA; Clark GM; Millard RE
    Hear Res; 1992 Sep; 62(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 1429252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Inroads toward robot-assisted cochlear implant surgery using steerable electrode arrays.
    Zhang J; Wei W; Ding J; Roland JT; Manolidis S; Simaan N
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1199-206. PubMed ID: 20864880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Is electrode-modiolus distance a prognostic factor for hearing performances after cochlear implant surgery?
    Esquia Medina GN; Borel S; Nguyen Y; Ambert-Dahan E; Ferrary E; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
    Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(6):406-13. PubMed ID: 24157488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults.
    Aschendorff A; Kromeier J; Klenzner T; Laszig R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):75S-79S. PubMed ID: 17496653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Some practical considerations in development of multichannel scala tympani prostheses.
    Walsh SM; Merzenich MM; Schindler RA; Leake-Jones PA
    Audiology; 1980; 19(2):164-75. PubMed ID: 6892767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Determinants of the effectiveness of electric stimulation of the auditory nerve with cochlear implants: II. Configuration of the stimulating electrodes].
    Kral A; Hartmann R; Klinke R
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 2000; 101(3):170-2. PubMed ID: 10870263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Acoustically evoked radial current densities in scala tympani.
    Brownell WE; Manis PB; Zidanic M; Spirou GA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Sep; 74(3):792-800. PubMed ID: 6630736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Cochlear Implantation in Otosclerosis: Surgical and Auditory Outcomes With a Brief on Facial Nerve Stimulation.
    Vashishth A; Fulcheri A; Rossi G; Prasad SC; Caruso A; Sanna M
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Oct; 38(9):e345-e353. PubMed ID: 28902803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Evaluation of a silicon-substrate modiolar eighth nerve implant in a guinea pig.
    Zappia JJ; Hetke JF; Altschuler RA; Niparko JK
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1990 Oct; 103(4):575-82. PubMed ID: 2123314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Chronic electrical stimulation of auditory nerve in cat: Physiological and histological results.
    Walsh SM; Leake-Jones PA
    Hear Res; 1982 Aug; 7(3):281-304. PubMed ID: 7118732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Tissue resistivities determine the current flow in the cochlea.
    Micco AG; Richter CP
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Oct; 14(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 16974151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Usefulness of Electrical Auditory Brainstem Responses to Assess the Functionality of the Cochlear Nerve Using an Intracochlear Test Electrode.
    Lassaletta L; Polak M; Huesers J; Díaz-Gómez M; Calvino M; Varela-Nieto I; Gavilán J
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e413-e420. PubMed ID: 29076926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Tuning characteristics of cochlear nucleus units in response to electrical stimulation of the cochlea.
    Glass I
    Hear Res; 1983 Nov; 12(2):223-37. PubMed ID: 6689010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.