116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12948604)
1. Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects.
de Balthasar C; Boëx C; Cosendai G; Valentini G; Sigrist A; Pelizzone M
Hear Res; 2003 Aug; 182(1-2):77-87. PubMed ID: 12948604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Channel interactions in patients using the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant.
Favre E; Pelizzone M
Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 66(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 8509306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems.
Boëx C; de Balthasar C; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2049-57. PubMed ID: 14587604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves.
Bierer JA; Faulkner KF
Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):247-58. PubMed ID: 20090533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems.
Boëx C; Kós MI; Pelizzone M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2058-65. PubMed ID: 14587605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
Saoji AA; Koka K; Litvak LM; Finley CC
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds.
Middlebrooks JC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):452-68. PubMed ID: 15296005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychophysical recovery from pulse-train forward masking in electric hearing.
Nelson DA; Donaldson GS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):2932-47. PubMed ID: 12509014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.
Bierer JA; Middlebrooks JC
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2004 Mar; 5(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 14564662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users.
Schatzer R; Koroleva I; Griessner A; Levin S; Kusovkov V; Yanov Y; Zierhofer C
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():99-106. PubMed ID: 25457654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatial channel interactions in cochlear implants.
Tang Q; Benítez R; Zeng FG
J Neural Eng; 2011 Aug; 8(4):046029. PubMed ID: 21750370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of stimulation mode, level and location on forward-masked excitation patterns in cochlear implant patients.
Chatterjee M; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Shannon RV
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 7(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 16270234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants.
Hughes ML; Goehring JL; Baudhuin JL; Schmid KK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2297. PubMed ID: 27794318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.
Dingemanse JG; Frijns JH; Briaire JJ
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):645-57. PubMed ID: 17086076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.
Botros A; Psarros C
Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):380-91. PubMed ID: 20090532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal masking in electric hearing.
Zeng FG; Chen H; Han S
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 6(4):390-400. PubMed ID: 16261267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of electrode design and configuration on channel interactions.
Stickney GS; Loizou PC; Mishra LN; Assmann PF; Shannon RV; Opie JM
Hear Res; 2006 Jan; 211(1-2):33-45. PubMed ID: 16338109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
