These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12948609)

  • 21. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M; Mom T; Guitton M; Poncet JL; Bonfils P; Avan P
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
    Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.
    Hauser R; Probst R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jan; 89(1):280-6. PubMed ID: 2002169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?
    Abel C; Wittekindt A; Kössl M
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 101(5):2362-71. PubMed ID: 19279155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Gender effects on high frequency distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Dunckley KT; Dreisbach LE
    Ear Hear; 2004 Dec; 25(6):554-64. PubMed ID: 15604916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Effect of contralateral noise exposure on otoacoustic distortion product emissions in man].
    Richter B; Hauser R; Löhle E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar; 74(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7755853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H; Zhong N
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during prolonged noise exposure.
    Eddins AC; Zuskov M; Salvi RJ
    Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):119-28. PubMed ID: 9925023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Age related changes to the dynamics of contralateral DPOAE suppression in human subjects.
    Konomi U; Kanotra S; James AL; Harrison RV
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jun; 43(1):15. PubMed ID: 24934087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans.
    Sun XM
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The ipsilaterally evoked olivocochlear reflex causes rapid adaptation of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission.
    Liberman MC; Puria S; Guinan JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jun; 99(6):3572-84. PubMed ID: 8655789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Vonthein R; Zenner HP
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Postnatal maturation of contralateral DPOAE suppression in a precocious animal model (chinchilla) of the human neonate.
    Harrison RV; Konomi U; Kanotra S; James AL
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 133(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 23373512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of contralateral stimulation by two-tone complexes, narrow-band and broad-band noise signals on the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels in humans.
    Lisowska G; Smurzynski J; Morawski K; Namyslowski G; Probst R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep; 122(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 12403123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Increased amplitude of distortion product emissions in the human caused by contralateral low intensity acoustic stimulation].
    Nieschalk M; Beneking R; Stoll W
    HNO; 1997 May; 45(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 9265021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of contralateral pure tone stimulation on distortion emissions suggests a frequency-specific functioning of the efferent cochlear control.
    Althen H; Wittekindt A; Gaese B; Kössl M; Abel C
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(7):1962-9. PubMed ID: 22262828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
    Sun XM; Shaver MD
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Kim DO; Dorn PA; Neely ST; Gorga MP
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Mar; 2(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11545148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical significance of relative probe-tone levels on distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Rasmussen AN; Popelka GR; Osterhammel PA; Nielsen LH
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 8146586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone-burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs.
    Moulin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1471-86. PubMed ID: 10738802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.