451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12949455)
1. Malignant obstructive jaundice: comparison of MRCP and ERCP in the evaluation of distal lesions.
Di Cesare E; Puglielli E; Michelini O; Pistoi MA; Lombardi L; Rossi M; Barile A; Masciocchi C
Radiol Med; 2003; 105(5-6):445-53. PubMed ID: 12949455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP.
Park MS; Kim TK; Kim KW; Park SW; Lee JK; Kim JS; Lee JH; Kim KA; Kim AY; Kim PN; Lee MG; Ha HK
Radiology; 2004 Oct; 233(1):234-40. PubMed ID: 15333766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): diagnostic usefulness].
Pamos S; Rivera P; Canelles P; Quiles F; Ortí E; Cuquerella J; Martínez V; Medina E
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Apr; 21(4):174-80. PubMed ID: 9633177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.
Domagk D; Wessling J; Reimer P; Hertel L; Poremba C; Senninger N; Heinecke A; Domschke W; Menzel J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 15330902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.
Lomas DJ; Bearcroft PW; Gimson AE
Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(7):1411-7. PubMed ID: 10460385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of biliary disease].
Iannicelli E; Sessa B; Argnani L; Galluzzo A; David V
Clin Ter; 2006; 157(5):425-9. PubMed ID: 17147050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Diagnostic value of secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (S-MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)].
Czakó L; Takács T; Morvay Z; Csernay L; Lonovics J
Orv Hetil; 2004 Mar; 145(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 15085592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography in Clinical Practice: Not as Good as We Once Thought.
Aydelotte JD; Ali J; Huynh PT; Coopwood TB; Uecker JM; Brown CV
J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Jul; 221(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 26047762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of 3-dimensional turbo spin echo and single-shot turbo spin echo with ERCP.
Chen RC; Lin KY; Lii JM; Yang MT; Chen WT; Tu HY; Wang CS
J Formos Med Assoc; 2003 Mar; 102(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 12783134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases.
Lomanto D; Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Mazzocchi P; Fiocca F; Lezoche E; Passariello R; Speranza V
Am J Surg; 1997 Jul; 174(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 9240949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Single shot MRI cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) with a "fast acquisition spin echo" sequence (FASE). Replacement of ERCP?].
Schulte B; Beyer D; Wedekind G; Meuser W
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 Jan; 8(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 9538925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, indications and clinical results].
Pavone P; Laghi A; Panebianco V; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 1997 Dec; 94(6):632-41. PubMed ID: 9524602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Malignant perihilar biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographic findings.
Yeh TS; Jan YY; Tseng JH; Chiu CT; Chen TC; Hwang TL; Chen MF
Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Feb; 95(2):432-40. PubMed ID: 10685746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Clinical value of intraductal ultrasonography for clarification of confusing ERCP results].
Wehrmann T; Martchenko K; Menke D; Lange P; Stergiou N
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Apr; 128(16):863-9. PubMed ID: 12701031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic cytology in biliary strictures. Personal experience.
Geraci G; Pisello F; Arnone E; Modica G; Sciumè C
G Chir; 2008 Oct; 29(10):403-6. PubMed ID: 18947461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant jaundice and cholestasis.
Pasanen PA; Partanen KP; Pikkarainen PH; Alhava EM; Janatuinen EK; Pirinen AE
Eur J Surg; 1993 Jan; 159(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 8095802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of MRCP compared to ERCP in the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic duct].
Hatano S; Kondoh S; Akiyama T; Okita K
Nihon Rinsho; 1998 Nov; 56(11):2874-9. PubMed ID: 9847613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected biliary obstruction.
Kalra M; Sahani D; Ahmad A; Saini S
Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2002 Apr; 4(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 11900682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pancreatic diseases: evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography.
Ueno E; Takada Y; Yoshida I; Toda J; Sugiura T; Toki F
Pancreas; 1998 Apr; 16(3):418-26. PubMed ID: 9548689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP): correlation with diagnosis using ERCP].
Lincender L; Vrcic D; Sadagic E; Vegar S; Mornjakovic A; Stevic N
Med Arh; 2002; 56(1 Suppl 1):25-8. PubMed ID: 12055719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
