These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12949561)
1. Are Bt crops safe? Mendelsohn M; Kough J; Vaituzis Z; Matthews K Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):1003-9. PubMed ID: 12949561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Toxicology. Panel urges further study of biotech corn. Kaiser J Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1867. PubMed ID: 11187032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial distribution of Aglais urticae (L.) and its host plant Urtica dioica (L.) in an agricultural landscape: implications for Bt maize risk assessment and post-market monitoring. Gathmann A; Wirooks L; Eckert J; Schuphan I Environ Biosafety Res; 2006; 5(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 16978572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bt crop risk assessment in the Netherlands. Knols BG; Dicke M Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):973-4. PubMed ID: 12949550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Plant science. The power of the pyramid. Moar WJ; Anilkumar KJ Science; 2007 Dec; 318(5856):1561-2. PubMed ID: 17975032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biotech companies must get back to basics to weigh up risks. Ewbank J Nature; 1999 Sep; 401(6750):207. PubMed ID: 10499565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Entomology. First light on genetic roots of Bt resistance. Stokstad E Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5531):778. PubMed ID: 11486062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on nontarget invertebrates. Marvier M; McCreedy C; Regetz J; Kareiva P Science; 2007 Jun; 316(5830):1475-7. PubMed ID: 17556584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ecology. New corn plant draws fire from GM food opponents. Ferber D Science; 2000 Feb; 287(5457):1390. PubMed ID: 10722381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]