323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12950510)
1. Issues in subgroup analyses and meta-analyses of clinical trials.
Bigger JT
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Sep; 14(9 Suppl):S6-8. PubMed ID: 12950510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What is right and what is wrong about evidence-based medicine?
Julian DG
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Sep; 14(9 Suppl):S2-5. PubMed ID: 12950509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Drug safety assessment in clinical trials: methodological challenges and opportunities.
Singh S; Loke YK
Trials; 2012 Aug; 13():138. PubMed ID: 22906139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Translation of clinical trials into clinical practice: use of results in formulating guidelines.
Camm AJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Sep; 14(9 Suppl):S9-14. PubMed ID: 12950511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analyses: what they can and cannot do.
Nordmann AJ; Kasenda B; Briel M
Swiss Med Wkly; 2012; 142():w13518. PubMed ID: 22407741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the validity of clinical trials.
Akobeng AK
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2008 Sep; 47(3):277-82. PubMed ID: 18728521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis.
Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can non-randomized trials be considered to be equivalent to randomized trials in forensic mental health?
Leese M
Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 16470506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. To screen or not to screen: how to improve clinical trials.
Held P; Swedberg K
J Card Fail; 1998 Sep; 4(3):237-8. PubMed ID: 9754596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Basics of designing a clinical trial: part I.
Whitney JD
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2000 Sep; 27(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10999963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rudiments of subgroup analyses.
Moyé LA
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2012; 54(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 22226001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity versus generalizability in clinical trial design and conduct.
Hennekens CH; Buring JE
J Card Fail; 1998 Sep; 4(3):239-41. PubMed ID: 9754597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Registered trials report less beneficial treatment effects than unregistered ones: a meta-epidemiological study in orthodontics.
Papageorgiou SN; Xavier GM; Cobourne MT; Eliades T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Aug; 100():44-52. PubMed ID: 29705094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Putting results of a clinical trial into perspective.
Wilcken NR; Gebski VJ; Pike R; Keech AC
Med J Aust; 2007 Apr; 186(7):368-70. PubMed ID: 17407436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical inference: critically weighing the evidence from trials and registries to make clinical decisions.
Morrison D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Sep; 72(3):381-385. PubMed ID: 18727119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Bilandzic A; Fitzpatrick T; Rosella L; Henry D
PLoS Med; 2016 Apr; 13(4):e1001987. PubMed ID: 27046153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
