These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12950974)

  • 21. Conservative restoration of severely damaged endodontically treated premolar teeth: a FEM study.
    Eraslan Ö; Eraslan O; Eskitaşcıoğlu G; Belli S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Jun; 15(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 20238232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Stress distribution with different restorations in teeth with curved roots: a finite element analysis study.
    Chatvanitkul C; Lertchirakarn V
    J Endod; 2010 Jan; 36(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 20003947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of crown ferrule heights and dowel material selection on the mechanical behavior of root-filled teeth: a finite element analysis.
    Watanabe MU; Anchieta RB; Rocha EP; Kina S; Almeida EO; Freitas AC; Basting RT
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 22372913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of thermal change on various dowel-and-core restorative materials.
    Yang HS; Lang LA; Guckes AD; Felton DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11458265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stress distribution in root filled teeth restored with various post and core techniques: effect of post length and crown height.
    Kainose K; Nakajima M; Foxton R; Wakabayashi N; Tagami J
    Int Endod J; 2015 Nov; 48(11):1023-32. PubMed ID: 25314030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of restorative dental materials on heat transmission in human teeth.
    Spierings TA; de Vree JH; Peters MC; Plasschaert AJ
    J Dent Res; 1984 Aug; 63(8):1096-100. PubMed ID: 6589271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of effect of root canal taper and post on tooth stress distribution].
    Zhang N; Feng CZ; Zhao SL; Fa YH; Cai XW
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Mar; 46(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 21575436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of temperature and stress distribution on all-ceramic restorations by using a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Güngör MA; Küçük M; Dündar M; Karaoğlu C; Artunç C
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Feb; 31(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 15009603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of one-piece computer aided design and computer aided manufacture involved zirconia post and core].
    Zhou TF; Zhang XH; Wang XZ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Feb; 47(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 25686334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites.
    Ausiello P; Apicella A; Davidson CL; Rengo S
    J Biomech; 2001 Oct; 34(10):1269-77. PubMed ID: 11522306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thermal-stress analysis of ceramic laminate veneer restorations with different incisal preparations using micro-computed tomography-based 3D finite element models.
    Celebi AT; Icer E; Eren MM; Baykasoglu C; Mugan A; Yildiz E
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Nov; 75():302-313. PubMed ID: 28768230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays: effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure.
    Magne P; Belser UC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Dec; 23(6):543-55. PubMed ID: 14703758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 3D finite element analysis on esthetic indirect dental restorations under thermal and mechanical loading.
    Cornacchia TP; Las Casas EB; Cimini CA; Peixoto RG
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2010 Nov; 48(11):1107-13. PubMed ID: 20635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Finite element analysis of thermal stress distribution in different restorative materials used in class V cavities.
    Guler MS; Guler C; Cakici F; Cakici EB; Sen S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 26755215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Jiang W; Bo H; Yongchun G; LongXing N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 20105674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method.
    Boschian Pest L; Guidotti S; Pietrabissa R; Gagliani M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 33(9):690-7. PubMed ID: 16922743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Viscoelastic finite element stress analysis of the thermal compatibility of dental bilayer ceramic systems.
    DeHoff PH; Anusavice KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 19260429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of post material and length on endodontically treated incisors: an in vitro and finite element study.
    Chuang SF; Yaman P; Herrero A; Dennison JB; Chang CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Dec; 104(6):379-88. PubMed ID: 21095401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Stress analysis of mandibular second premolar with three different restorations].
    Cao J; Wang SA; Tang BH
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 26(4):374-7. PubMed ID: 18780493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.