These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12952629)
1. An evolutionary explanation of the aggregation model of species coexistence. Rohlfs M; Hoffmeister TS Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Aug; 270 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S33-5. PubMed ID: 12952629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial aggregation across ephemeral resource patches in insect communities: an adaptive response to natural enemies? Rohlfs M; Hoffmeister TS Oecologia; 2004 Aug; 140(4):654-61. PubMed ID: 15232730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stable coexistence of ecologically identical species: conspecific aggregation via reproductive interference. Ruokolainen L; Hanski I J Anim Ecol; 2016 May; 85(3):638-47. PubMed ID: 26781758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Local movement and edge effects on competition and coexistence in ephemeral-patch models. Remer LC; Heard SB Am Nat; 1998 Dec; 152(6):896-904. PubMed ID: 18811435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clutch-size behavior and coexistence in ephemeral-patch competition models. Heard SB; Remer LC Am Nat; 1997 Dec; 150(6):744-70. PubMed ID: 18811334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scaling up from local competition to regional coexistence across two scales of spatial heterogeneity: insect larvae in the fruits of Apeiba membranacea. Inouye BD Oecologia; 2005 Sep; 145(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 15891846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eco-Evolutionary dynamics enable coexistence via neighbor-dependent selection. Vasseur DA; Amarasekare P; Rudolf VH; Levine JM Am Nat; 2011 Nov; 178(5):E96-E109. PubMed ID: 22030739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coexistence in a variable environment: eco-evolutionary perspectives. Kremer CT; Klausmeier CA J Theor Biol; 2013 Dec; 339():14-25. PubMed ID: 23702333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporally explicit habitat ecology and the coexistence of species. Johnson MP Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Oct; 267(1456):1967-72. PubMed ID: 11075709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The interaction between the spatial distribution of resource patches and population density: consequences for intraspecific growth and morphology. Jacobson B; Grant JW; Peres-Neto PR J Anim Ecol; 2015 Jul; 84(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 25757660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oviposition site preferences and performance in natural resources in the human commensals Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Soto EM; Soto IM; Cortese MD; Hasson E Fly (Austin); 2011; 5(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 21540639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When does local spatial structure hinder competitive coexistence and reverse competitive hierarchies? Murrell DJ Ecology; 2010 Jun; 91(6):1605-16. PubMed ID: 20583703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Coexistence in metacommunities: a tree-species model. Mena-Lorca J; Velasco-Hernández JX; Marquet PA Math Biosci; 2006 Jul; 202(1):42-56. PubMed ID: 16797037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scramble in behaviour and ecology. Parker GA Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2000 Nov; 355(1403):1637-45. PubMed ID: 11127910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The eco-evolutionary responses of a generalist consumer to resource competition. Abrams PA Evolution; 2012 Oct; 66(10):3130-43. PubMed ID: 23025603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Competition and species coexistence in a metapopulation model: can fast asymmetric migration reverse the outcome of competition in a homogeneous environment? Ngoc DN; de la Parra RB; Zavala MA; Auger P J Theor Biol; 2010 Sep; 266(2):256-63. PubMed ID: 20600132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Aggregation in insect communities colonizing cattle-dung. Wall R; Lee CM Bull Entomol Res; 2010 Aug; 100(4):481-7. PubMed ID: 20003575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hutchinson revisited: patterns of density regulation and the coexistence of strong competitors. Münkemüller T; Bugmann H; Johst K J Theor Biol; 2009 Jul; 259(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 19298829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating density dependence into the oviposition preference-offspring performance hypothesis. Ellis AM J Anim Ecol; 2008 Mar; 77(2):247-56. PubMed ID: 18194264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]