These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1295272)

  • 1. [Dependence of 'audio-phonatoric coupling' of speech rate and speech loudness].
    Jäncke L
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(4):581-97. PubMed ID: 1295272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compensatory responses to loudness-shifted voice feedback during production of Mandarin speech.
    Liu H; Zhang Q; Xu Y; Larson CR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2405-12. PubMed ID: 17902874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What marks the beat of speech?
    Kochanski G; Orphanidou C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2780-91. PubMed ID: 18529194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delayed auditory feedback in polyglot simultaneous interpreters.
    Fabbro F; Darò V
    Brain Lang; 1995 Mar; 48(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 7757448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical perturbation of jaw movements during speech: effects on articulation and phonation.
    Bauer A; Jäncke L; Kalveram KT
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 2):1108-12. PubMed ID: 7478865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rhythmic versus phonemic interference in delayed auditory feedback.
    Kaspar K; Rübeling H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):932-43. PubMed ID: 20966383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audio-visual interactions with intact clearly audible speech.
    Davis C; Kim J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1103-21. PubMed ID: 15370518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stuttering: speech pattern characteristics under fluency-inducing conditions.
    Andrews G; Howie PM; Dozsa M; Guitar BE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Jun; 25(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 7120960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of HearFones on speaking and singing voice quality.
    Laukkanen AM; Mickelson NP; Laitala M; Syrjä T; Salo A; Sihvo M
    J Voice; 2004 Dec; 18(4):475-87. PubMed ID: 15567049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EFFECT OF DELAYED AUDITORY FEEDBACK, SPEECH RATE, AND SEX ON SPEECH PRODUCTION.
    Stuart A; Kalinowski J
    Percept Mot Skills; 2015 Jun; 120(3):747-65. PubMed ID: 26029968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disruptive effects of auditory signal delay on speech perception with lipreading.
    Pandey PC; Kunov H; Abel SM
    J Aud Res; 1986 Jan; 26(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 3610989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of speech noise on vocal fundamental frequency using power spectral analysis.
    Lee GS; Hsiao TY; Yang CC; Kuo TB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 17485983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reduction of stuttering frequency using frequency-shifted and delayed auditory feedback].
    Natke U
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2000; 52(4):151-9. PubMed ID: 10782008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables.
    Natke U; Kalveram KT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 11407562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Right hemisphere specialization for intensity discrimination of musical and speech sounds.
    Brancucci A; Babiloni C; Rossini PM; Romani GL
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1916-23. PubMed ID: 16168732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between masking levels and phonatory stability in normal-speaking women.
    Ferrand CT
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 16157468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disentangling the effects of phonation and articulation: hemispheric asymmetries in the auditory N1m response of the human brain.
    Tiitinen H; Mäkelä AM; Mäkinen V; May PJ; Alku P
    BMC Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 6():62. PubMed ID: 16225699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP correlates of involuntary attention capture by prosodic salience in speech.
    Wang J; Friedman D; Ritter W; Bersick M
    Psychophysiology; 2005 Jan; 42(1):43-55. PubMed ID: 15720580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.