BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12953127)

  • 1. A randomised study of 10 microg/kg/day (single dose) vs 2 x 5 microg/kg/day (split dose) G-CSF as stem cell mobilisation regimen in high-risk breast cancer patients.
    Carrión R; Serrano D; Gómez-Pineda A; Díez-Martín JL
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2003 Sep; 32(6):563-7. PubMed ID: 12953127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone in breast cancer patients: higher progenitor cell yield by delivering divided doses (2 x 5 microg/kg) compared to a single dose (1 x 10 microg/kg).
    Kröger N; Zeller W; Hassan HT; Krüger W; Gutensohn K; Löliger C; Zander AR
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jan; 23(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 10197796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma.
    Arora M; Burns LJ; Barker JN; Miller JS; Defor TE; Olujohungbe AB; Weisdorf DJ
    Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2004 Jun; 10(6):395-404. PubMed ID: 15148493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stem cell mobilisation with 16 microg/kg vs 10 microg/kg of G-CSF for allogeneic transplantation in healthy donors.
    Kröger N; Renges H; Sonnenberg S; Krüger W; Gutensohn K; Dielschneider T; Cortes-Dericks L; Zander AR
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2002 May; 29(9):727-30. PubMed ID: 12040468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: a randomized comparison of filgrastim, sargramostim, or sequential sargramostim and filgrastim.
    Weaver CH; Schulman KA; Buckner CD
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2001 May; 27 Suppl 2():S23-9. PubMed ID: 11436117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells with paclitaxel (taxol) as a single chemotheraupetic agent, associated with rhG-CSF.
    Gómez-Espuch J; Moraleda JM; Ortuño F; Lozano ML; Ayala F; Vallejo C; de Arriba F; Vicente V
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2000 Feb; 25(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 10673692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mobilization strategies for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells: Results from a pilot study of delayed addition G-CSF following chemotherapy and review of the literature.
    Jacoub JF; Suryadevara U; Pereyra V; Colón D; Fontelonga A; Mackintosh FR; Hall SW; Ascensão JL
    Exp Hematol; 2006 Nov; 34(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 17046563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy and toxicity of a high-dose G-CSF schedule for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in healthy donors.
    Martínez C; Urbano-Ispizua A; Marín P; Merino A; Rovira M; Carreras E; Montserrat E
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Dec; 24(12):1273-8. PubMed ID: 10627634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ESHAP plus G-CSF as an effective peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization regimen in pretreated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: comparison with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF.
    Lee JL; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim EK; Kim SB; Kang YK; Lee J; Kim MW; Park CJ; Chi HS; Huh J; Kim SH; Suh C
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2005 Mar; 35(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 15654353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CD34+ dose-driven administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after high-dose chemotherapy in lymphoma patients.
    Todisco E; Castagna L; Sarina B; Mazza R; Magagnoli M; Balzarotti M; Nozza A; Siracusano L; Timofeeva I; Anastasia A; Demarco M; Santoro A
    Eur J Haematol; 2007 Feb; 78(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 17313558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The VAD chemotherapy regimen plus a G-CSF dose of 10 microg/kg is as effective and less toxic than high-dose cyclophosphamide plus a G-CSF dose of 5 microg/kg for progenitor cell mobilization: results from a monocentric study of 82 patients.
    Lefrère F; Zohar S; Ghez D; Delarue R; Audat F; Suarez F; Hermine O; Damaj G; Maillard N; Ribeil JA; Azagury M; Misbahi R; Jondeau K; Cavazzana-Calvo M; Dal Cortivo L; Varet B
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Apr; 37(8):725-9. PubMed ID: 16518433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reduced dose of lenograstim is as efficacious as standard dose of filgrastim for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and transplantation: a randomized study in patients undergoing autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation.
    Ataergin S; Arpaci F; Turan M; Solchaga L; Cetin T; Ozturk M; Ozet A; Komurcu S; Ozturk B
    Am J Hematol; 2008 Aug; 83(8):644-8. PubMed ID: 18508321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Very large amounts of peripheral blood progenitor cells eliminate severe thrombocytopenia after high-dose melphalan in advanced breast cancer patients.
    Benedetti G; Patoia L; Giglietti A; Alessio M; Pelicci P; Grignani F
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Nov; 24(9):971-9. PubMed ID: 10556956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled, dose escalation study of the tolerability and efficacy of filgrastim for haemopoietic stem cell mobilisation in patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis.
    Snowden JA; Biggs JC; Milliken ST; Fuller A; Staniforth D; Passuello F; Renwick J; Brooks PM
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1998 Dec; 22(11):1035-41. PubMed ID: 9877264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GM-CSF-based mobilization effect in normal healthy donors for allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.
    Sohn SK; Kim JG; Seo KW; Chae YS; Jung JT; Suh JS; Lee KB
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2002 Jul; 30(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 12132046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone and engraftment kinetics following autologous transplantation in children and adolescents with solid tumor.
    Watanabe H; Watanabe T; Suzuya H; Wakata Y; Kaneko M; Onishi T; Okamoto Y; Abe T; Kawano Y; Kagami S; Takaue Y
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2006 Apr; 37(7):661-8. PubMed ID: 16489358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization from dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin plus G-CSF than from less intensive chemotherapy regimens.
    Stewart DA; Guo D; Morris D; Poon MC; Ruether BA; Jones AR; Klassen J; Auer I; Luider J; Chaudhry A; Brown C; Russell JA
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jan; 23(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 10197794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized comparison of once versus twice daily recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) for stem cell mobilization in healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation.
    Kröger N; Renges H; Krüger W; Gutensohn K; Löliger C; Carrero I; Cortes L; Zander AR
    Br J Haematol; 2000 Dec; 111(3):761-5. PubMed ID: 11122135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in patients undergoing chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (SCT) for high risk breast cancer (HRBC).
    Benet I; Prosper BF; Marugan I; Lluch A; Arbona C; Castillo I; Solano C; Garcia-Conde J
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jun; 23(11):1101-7. PubMed ID: 10382948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF].
    Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Liu P; Yang JL; Zhou SY; Zhou AP; Zhang CG; Ai B
    Ai Zheng; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1311-6. PubMed ID: 14693058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.