311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12953323)
1. Comparison of two intrauterine pressure catheters during labor.
Dowdle MA
J Reprod Med; 2003 Jul; 48(7):501-5. PubMed ID: 12953323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating a new intrauterine pressure catheter.
Dowdle M
J Reprod Med; 1997 Aug; 42(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 9284013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of intrauterine pressure measurements.
Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Tien CY; Ratnam SS
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):800-2. PubMed ID: 1923200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monitoring intrauterine pressure during active labor. A prospective comparison of two methods.
Devoe LD; Gardner P; Dear C; Searle N
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):811-4. PubMed ID: 2795563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artifactually elevated basal uterine tonus resulting from measurement of hydrostatic pressure by transducer-tipped intrauterine catheters.
Ross MG; Walton J
J Perinatol; 1994; 14(5):408-10. PubMed ID: 7830158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extramembranous placement of an air-coupled vs. transducer-tipped intrauterine pressure catheter.
Sciscione AC; Duhl A; Pollock MA; Hoffman MK; Rhee A; Colmorgen GH
J Reprod Med; 2005 Aug; 50(8):578-84. PubMed ID: 16220762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The prediction of "controlled" uterine rupture by the use of intrauterine pressure catheters.
Devoe LD; Croom CS; Youssef AA; Murray C
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 80(4):626-9. PubMed ID: 1407884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Elevated uterine activity increases the risk of fetal acidosis at birth.
Bakker PC; Kurver PH; Kuik DJ; Van Geijn HP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 196(4):313.e1-6. PubMed ID: 17403401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uterine activity monitoring during labor.
Bakker PC; Van Rijswijk S; van Geijn HP
J Perinat Med; 2007; 35(6):468-77. PubMed ID: 18052832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of new catheter systems for intrauterine pressure measurement.
Chia YT; Arulkumaran S; Yang M; Ratnam SS
J Perinat Med; 1995; 23(6):437-41. PubMed ID: 8904472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Determination of intrauterine pressure using catheter-tip transducer inserted outside fetal membranes].
Yagami H; Kurauchi O; Furui T; Ohno Y; Ando H; Nomura S; Tanamura A; Mizutani S; Tomoda Y; Kasugai M
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Dec; 45(12):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8270824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of intrauterine pressure waveform from transabdominal electrohysterography.
Euliano T; Skowronski M; Marossero D; Shuster J; Edwards R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Dec; 19(12):811-6. PubMed ID: 17190691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intrauterine pressure catheter performance in an in vitro uterine model: a stimulation of problems for intrapartum monitoring.
Devoe LD; Smith RP; Stoker R
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):285-9. PubMed ID: 8336879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intrauterine-pressure studies in Thai nulliparous labour: the use of catheter-tip pressure transducer.
Tannirandorn Y; Witoonpanich P
J Med Assoc Thai; 1993 Aug; 76(8):436-40. PubMed ID: 7964245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of stimulatory and inhibitory drugs on uterine electrical activity measured noninvasively from the abdominal surface of pregnant rats.
Buhimschi CS; Saade GR; Buhimschi IA; Gokdeniz R; Boyle MB; Garfield RE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jul; 183(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 10920311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of internal uterine pressure by joint amplitude and frequency analysis of electrohysterographic signals.
Rabotti C; Mischi M; van Laar JO; Oei GS; Bergmans JW
Physiol Meas; 2008 Jul; 29(7):829-41. PubMed ID: 18583724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery.
Maul H; Maner WL; Olson G; Saade GR; Garfield RE
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):297-301. PubMed ID: 15280119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monitoring Uterine Activity during Labor: Clinician Interpretation of Electrohysterography versus Intrauterine Pressure Catheter and Tocodynamometry.
Euliano TY; Nguyen MT; Darmanjian S; Busowski JD; Euliano N; Gregg AR
Am J Perinatol; 2016 Jul; 33(9):831-8. PubMed ID: 26960704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring uterine activity.
Allman AC; Steer PJ
Br J Hosp Med; 1993 May 5-18; 49(9):649-53. PubMed ID: 8508259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of surface acquired uterine electromyography and intrauterine pressure catheter to assess uterine activity.
Haran G; Elbaz M; Fejgin MD; Biron-Shental T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):412.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22284960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
