364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12954828)
1. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability.
Beaulé PE; Dorey FJ; Matta JM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Sep; 85(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 12954828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Judet view radiographs accuracy in classification of acetabular fractures compared with three-dimensional computerized tomographic scan: a retrospective study.
Tazeabadi SA; Noroozi SG; Salehzadeh M; Bahardoust M; Farahini H; Hajializade M; Yeganeh A
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):405. PubMed ID: 32590966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum.
Petrisor BA; Bhandari M; Orr RD; Mandel S; Kwok DC; Schemitsch EH
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2003 Jun; 123(5):228-33. PubMed ID: 12720013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification with multidetector CT: are standard Judet radiographs necessary?
Ohashi K; El-Khoury GY; Abu-Zahra KW; Berbaum KS
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 17005769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What Are the Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Gap and Stepoff Measurements in Acetabular Fractures?
Meesters AML; Ten Duis K; Banierink H; Stirler VMA; Wouters PCR; Kraeima J; de Vries JPM; Witjes MJH; IJpma FFA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 478(12):2801-2808. PubMed ID: 32769535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-Column Classification for Acetabular Fractures: Introduction and Reproducibility Assessment.
Zhang R; Yin Y; Li A; Wang Z; Hou Z; Zhuang Y; Fan S; Wu Z; Yi C; Lyu G; Ma X; Zhang Y
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Nov; 101(22):2015-2025. PubMed ID: 31764364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acetabular fracture assessment in four different pelvic trauma centers: have the Judet views become superfluous?
Clarke-Jenssen J; Øvre SA; Røise O; Madsen JE
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Jul; 135(7):913-8. PubMed ID: 25931251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can experts in acetabular fracture care determine hip stability after posterior wall fractures using plain radiographs and computed tomography?
Davis AT; Moed BR
J Orthop Trauma; 2013 Oct; 27(10):587-91. PubMed ID: 23287759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low interobserver and intraobserver reliability using the Matta radiographic system for intraoperative assessment of reduction following acetabular ORIF.
Southam BR; Schroeder AJ; Shah NS; Avilucea FR; Finnan RP; Archdeacon MT
Injury; 2022 Jul; 53(7):2595-2599. PubMed ID: 35641334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of articular fragment displacement in acetabular fractures: a comparison of computerized tomography and plain radiographs.
Borrelli J; Goldfarb C; Catalano L; Evanoff BA
J Orthop Trauma; 2002 Aug; 16(7):449-56; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 12172273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for Letournel acetabular fracture classification system using 3-dimensional printed solid models.
Keltz E; Keshet D; Peled E; Zvi Y; Norman D; Keren Y
World J Orthop; 2021 Feb; 12(2):82-93. PubMed ID: 33614427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of computed tomography for determining the diagnosis of acetabular fractures.
O'Toole RV; Cox G; Shanmuganathan K; Castillo RC; Turen CH; Sciadini MF; Nascone JW
J Orthop Trauma; 2010 May; 24(5):284-90. PubMed ID: 20418733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and management of distal humeral fractures. Evaluation of reliability and diagnostic accuracy.
Doornberg J; Lindenhovius A; Kloen P; van Dijk CN; Zurakowski D; Ring D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 16882904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ASSESSMENT OF INTEROBSERVER RELIABILITY FOR THE LETOURNEL AND JUDET CLASSIFICATION.
Yucens M; Aydemir AN; Demirkan AF
Acta Ortop Bras; 2024; 32(1):e267640. PubMed ID: 38532863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid prototyping in the assessment, classification and preoperative planning of acetabular fractures.
Hurson C; Tansey A; O'Donnchadha B; Nicholson P; Rice J; McElwain J
Injury; 2007 Oct; 38(10):1158-62. PubMed ID: 17884058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT-generated radiographs in obese patients with acetabular fractures: can they be used in lieu of plain radiographs?
Sinatra PM; Moed BR
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Nov; 472(11):3362-9. PubMed ID: 24867453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. There Is No Column: A New Classification for Acetabular Fractures.
Herman A; Tenenbaum S; Ougortsin V; Shazar N
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jan; 100(2):e8. PubMed ID: 29342067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of three radiological classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Sayed-Noor AS; Agren PH; Wretenberg P
Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Sep; 32(9):861-6. PubMed ID: 22097161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of recategorized Neer classification in differentiating 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented proximal humeral fractures in 116 patients.
Sumrein BO; Mattila VM; Lepola V; Laitinen MK; Launonen AP;
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1756-1761. PubMed ID: 29866397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. What is the value of 3D virtual reality in understanding acetabular fractures?
Brouwers L; Pull Ter Gunne AF; de Jongh MA; Maal TJJ; Vreeken R; van der Heijden FHWM; Leenen LPH; Spanjersberg WR; van Helden SH; Verbeek DO; Bemelman M; Lansink KWW
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 31531739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
