164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12954895)
1. CT colonography: Protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT--study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.
Wessling J; Fischbach R; Meier N; Allkemper T; Klusmeier J; Ludwig K; Heindel W
Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):753-9. PubMed ID: 12954895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Bartram CI; Morgan PR; Talbot IC; Fry N; Saunders BP; Khosraviani K; Atkin W
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 14519872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of colorectal polyps: comparison of multi-detector row CT and MR colonography in a colon phantom.
Wessling J; Fischbach R; Borchert A; Kugel H; Allkemper T; Osada N; Heindel W
Radiology; 2006 Oct; 241(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 16908674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multi-detector-row CT-colonography: detection of artificial endoluminal lesions in an in-vitro-model with optimization of image quality using a noise reduction filter algorithm.
Branschofsky M; Vogt C; Aurich V; Beck A; Mödder U; Cohnen M
Eur J Med Res; 2006 Jan; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 16504955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging.
Hara AK; Johnson CD; MacCarty RL; Welch TJ; McCollough CH; Harmsen WS
Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):461-5. PubMed ID: 11323473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy.
Iannaccone R; Laghi A; Catalano C; Brink JA; Mangiapane F; Trenna S; Piacentini F; Passariello R
Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 14657315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of different 16-row CT colonography protocols using a porcine model].
Luz O; Schäfer J; Dammann F; Vonthein R; Heuschmid M; Claussen CD
Rofo; 2004 Oct; 176(10):1493-500. PubMed ID: 15383984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of spatial resolution and tube current on computer-aided detection of polyps on CT colonographic images: phantom study.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Shin CI; Kim HC; Lee JG; Kim JH; Choi JY; Eun HW; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi BI
Radiology; 2008 Aug; 248(2):492-503. PubMed ID: 18539892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT colonography: does improved z resolution help computer-aided polyp detection?
Sundaram P; Beaulieu CF; Paik DS; Schraedley-Desmond P; Napel S
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2663-74. PubMed ID: 14596303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Optimization of the technique of virtual colonoscopy using a multislice spiral computerized tomography].
Laghi A; Catalano C; Panebianco V; Iannaccone R; Iori S; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2000 Dec; 100(6):459-64. PubMed ID: 11307507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protocol optimization of multidetector computed tomography colonography using pig colonic phantoms.
Won HJ; Choi BI; Kim SH; Kim YI; Youn BJ; Han JK
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 15597017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of image acquisition parameters on CT artifacts and polyp depiction in spiral CT colonography: in vitro evaluation.
Whiting BR; McFarland EG; Brink JA
Radiology; 2000 Oct; 217(1):165-72. PubMed ID: 11012440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimization of multidetector array CT acquisition parameters for CT colonography.
McCollough CH
Abdom Imaging; 2002; 27(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 12173355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection.
Macari M; Bini EJ; Xue X; Milano A; Katz SS; Resnick D; Chandarana H; Krinsky G; Klingenbeck K; Marshall CH; Megibow AJ
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 12147833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT colonography: determination of optimal CT technique using a novel colon phantom.
Johnson KT; Johnson CD; Anderson SM; Bruesewitz MR; Mccollough CH
Abdom Imaging; 2004; 29(2):173-6. PubMed ID: 15290942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of low-contrast objects: experimental comparison of single- and multi-detector row CT with a phantom.
Verdun FR; Denys A; Valley JF; Schnyder P; Meuli RA
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):426-31. PubMed ID: 11997548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom.
Birnbaum BA; Hindman N; Lee J; Babb JS
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 17185663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of scanning parameters for multi-slice CT colonography: experiments with synthetic and animal phantoms.
Embleton KV; Nicholson DA; Hufton AP; Jackson A
Clin Radiol; 2003 Dec; 58(12):955-63. PubMed ID: 14654028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of scanning parameters for CT colonography.
Power NP; Pryor MD; Martin A; Horrocks J; McLean AM; Reznek RH
Br J Radiol; 2002 May; 75(893):401-8. PubMed ID: 12036832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
