These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12956309)

  • 1. Communication in noise with acoustic and electronic hearing protection devices.
    Plyler PN; Klumpp ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Jul; 14(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 12956309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of warble tones in wideband noise with and without hearing protection devices.
    Letowski T; McGee L
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1993 Dec; 37(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 8304681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Seixas N
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Occluded insertion loss from intracochlear pressure measurements during acoustic shock wave exposure.
    Anderson DA; Argo TF; Greene NT
    Hear Res; 2023 Feb; 428():108669. PubMed ID: 36565603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection and reaction thresholds for reverse alarms in noise with and without passive hearing protection.
    Laroche C; Giguère C; Vaillancourt V; Roy K; Pageot LP; Nélisse H; Ellaham N; Nassrallah F
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Feb; 57(sup1):S51-S60. PubMed ID: 29172790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Augmented warning sound detection for hearing protectors.
    Bernstein ER; Brammer AJ; Yu G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):EL29-34. PubMed ID: 24437853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of an auditory situation awareness test battery for advanced hearing protectors and TCAPS: detection subtest of DRILCOM (detection-recognition/identification-localization-communication).
    Lee K; Casali JG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup1):22-33. PubMed ID: 27905220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Training to Improve Spatial Hearing and Situation Awareness when Wearing Hearing Protection.
    Golob EJ; Nelson JT; Walasek JA; Piedra ET; Mock JR; Adams MJK; Esquivel CCR; Spear CSA
    Mil Med; 2024 Jan; 189(1-2):e306-e312. PubMed ID: 37715688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold.
    Berger EH; Kerivan JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 6886201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation-based digital noise reduction for application to hearing protectors to reduce noise and maintain intelligibility.
    Chung K; Tufts J; Nelson L
    Hum Factors; 2009 Feb; 51(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 19634311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of electronic ANR and conventional hearing protectors on vehicle backup alarm detection in noise.
    Casali JG; Robinson GS; Dabney EC; Gauger D
    Hum Factors; 2004; 46(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15151152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of user volume control settings for portable music players with three earphone configurations in quiet and noisy environments.
    Henry P; Foots A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 22436116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing protection devices: Use at work predicts use at play.
    Beach EF; Gilliver M; Williams W
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2016 Sep; 71(5):281-288. PubMed ID: 26927729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods.
    Karch SJ; Federman J; Ginsberg JT; Qureshi I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A deep neural-network classifier for photograph-based estimation of hearing protection attenuation and fit.
    Smalt CJ; Ciccarelli GA; Rodriguez AR; Murphy WJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):1067. PubMed ID: 34470332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards a Holistic Model Explaining Hearing Protection Device Use among Workers.
    Doutres O; Terroir J; Jolly C; Gauvin C; Martin L; Negrini A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 35564973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding speech when wearing communication headsets and hearing protectors with subband processing.
    Brammer AJ; Yu G; Bernstein ER; Cherniack MG; Peterson DR; Tufts JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):671-81. PubMed ID: 25096102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
    Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.