630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12956493)
1. Gingival sulcus simulation model for evaluating the penetration characteristics of elastomeric impression materials.
Aimjirakul P; Masuda T; Takahashi H; Miura H
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 12956493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
Hondrum SO
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of sulcular width on the linear accuracy of impression materials in the presence of an undercut.
Baharav H; Kupershmidt I; Laufer BZ; Cardash HS
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 15543916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of marginal thickness on the distortion of different impression materials.
Laufer BZ; Baharav H; Ganor Y; Cardash HS
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 8933434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tear and energy properties of three impression materials.
Hondrum SO
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 7748444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tear strength of five elastomeric impression materials at two setting times and two tearing rates.
Lawson NC; Burgess JO; Litaker M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 18533981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sulcus reproduction with elastomeric impression materials: a new in vitro testing method.
Finger WJ; Kurokawa R; Takahashi H; Komatsu M
Dent Mater; 2008 Dec; 24(12):1655-60. PubMed ID: 18499246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique.
Perakis N; Belser UC; Magne P
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions.
Johnson GH; Lepe X; Aw TC
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 14564290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
Payne JA; Pereira BP
Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Working time of elastomeric impression materials: relevance of rheological tests.
Balkenhol M; Kanehira M; Finger WJ; Wöstmann B
Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):347-52. PubMed ID: 18269123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface detail reproduction of elastomeric impression materials related to rheological properties.
German MJ; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):951-6. PubMed ID: 18164051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the precision of three implant transfer impression techniques using two elastomeric impression materials.
Mostafa TM; Elgendy MN; Kashef NA; Halim MM
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):525-8. PubMed ID: 21209987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Issues in handling impression materials.
Giordano R
Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12004656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials.
Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
