BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

405 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12956497)

  • 1. Patient satisfaction following restoration of shortened mandibular dental arches in a randomized controlled trial.
    Jepson N; Allen F; Moynihan P; Kelly P; Thomason M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 12956497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resin-bonded cantilever partial dentures are effective in terms of patient satisfaction in the restoration of the mandibular shortened dental arch.
    Emami E; Feine JS
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 10(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20230975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-year clinical trial of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures incorporating novel attachments.
    Jiang T; Hong W; Zhang Q
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 15945310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment.
    Ohkubo C; Kobayashi M; Suzuki Y; Hosoi T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 19216279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mastication in subjects with extremely shortened dental arches rehabilitated with removable partial dentures.
    Arce-Tumbay J; Sanchez-Ayala A; Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; Campanha NH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(6):517-9. PubMed ID: 22146249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors related to patients' general satisfaction with removable partial dentures: a stepwise multiple regression analysis.
    Zlatarić DK; Celebić A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):86-8. PubMed ID: 18350954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
    Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
    MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of prosthetic treatment for shortened dental arches on oral health-related quality of life, self-reports of pain and jaw disability: results from the pilot-phase of a randomized multicentre trial.
    Wolfart S; Heydecke G; Luthardt RG; Marré B; Freesmeyer WB; Stark H; Wöstmann B; Mundt T; Pospiech P; Jahn F; Gitt I; Schädler M; Aggstaller H; Talebpur F; Busche E; Bell M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Nov; 32(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 16202045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effects of removable partial dentures on the quality of life in people with shortened dental arches].
    Armellini DB; Heydecke G; Witter DJ; Creugers NH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2009 Dec; 116(12):687-93. PubMed ID: 20101937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality of removable partial dentures worn by the adult U.S. population.
    Hummel SK; Wilson MA; Marker VA; Nunn ME
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 12239478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
    Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-perceived changes in oral health-related quality of life after receiving different types of conventional prosthetic treatments: a cohort follow-up study.
    Montero J; Castillo-Oyagüe R; Lynch CD; Albaladejo A; Castaño A
    J Dent; 2013 Jun; 41(6):493-503. PubMed ID: 23353070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
    Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masticatory performance, maximum occlusal force, and occlusal contact area in patients with bilaterally missing molars and distal extension removable partial dentures.
    Aras K; Hasanreisoğlu U; Shinogaya T
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 19418870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time to survival for the restoration of the shortened lower dental arch.
    Thomason JM; Moynihan PJ; Steen N; Jepson NJ
    J Dent Res; 2007 Jul; 86(7):646-50. PubMed ID: 17586712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
    Walton JN; MacEntee MI; Glick N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Caries incidence following restoration of shortened lower dental arches in a randomized controlled trial.
    Jepson NJ; Moynihan PJ; Kelly PJ; Watson GW; Thomason JM
    Br Dent J; 2001 Aug; 191(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 11523885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Extension of (extremely) shortened dental arches by fixed or removable partial dentures].
    Witter DJ; Hoefnagel RA; Snoek PA; Creugers NH
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2009 Nov; 116(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 19999671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.