These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12956587)

  • 1. Dual-task interference with equal task emphasis: graded capacity sharing or central postponement?
    Ruthruff E; Pashler HE; Hazeltine E
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):801-16. PubMed ID: 12956587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing bottlenecks in dual-task performance: structural limitation or strategic postponement?
    Ruthruff E; Pashler HE; Klaassen A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 11340869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2002 Nov; 66(4):274-86. PubMed ID: 12466925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 12669744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual Dominance Effect upon Passing the Central Bottleneck of Information Processing.
    Yao XQ; Yang YQ; Chen SY; Sun W; Chen Q
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Aug; 131(16):1926-1935. PubMed ID: 30082523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological examination of response-related interference while dual-tasking: is it motoric or attentional?
    Jung KH; Martin T; Ruthruff E
    Psychol Res; 2021 Mar; 85(2):660-678. PubMed ID: 32020364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 8189196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of input and output modality pairings in dual-task performance: evidence for content-dependent central interference.
    Hazeltine E; Ruthruff E; Remington RW
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Jun; 52(4):291-345. PubMed ID: 16581054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Processing order in dual-task situations: The "first-come, first-served" principle and the impact of task order instructions.
    Strobach T; Hendrich E; Kübler S; Müller H; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1785-1803. PubMed ID: 29978280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1279-1293. PubMed ID: 36107664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-task slowing and the effects of cross-task compatibility.
    Azuma R; Prinz W; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 May; 57(4):693-713. PubMed ID: 15204129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model.
    Tombu M; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Aug; 31(4):790-802. PubMed ID: 16131250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the importance of Task 1 and error performance measures in PRP dual-task studies.
    Strobach T; Schütz A; Schubert T
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():403. PubMed ID: 25904890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating central and auditory attention: Is there a shared bottleneck for response selection and auditory search?
    Kattner F; Reimer CB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1564-1574. PubMed ID: 32419615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):147-65. PubMed ID: 23895445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order?
    Leonhard T; Fernández SR; Ulrich R; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 20718575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage?
    Johnston JC; McCann RS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):694-719. PubMed ID: 16707358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2460-2477. PubMed ID: 27734768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.