These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12959553)

  • 1. Limitations of current risk characterization methods in probabilistic environmental risk assessment.
    Verdonck FA; Aldenberg T; Jaworska J; Vanrolleghem PA
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Sep; 22(9):2209-13. PubMed ID: 12959553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Geo-referencing of probabilistic risk of new chemicals in rivers.
    Verdonck FA; Janssen CR; Jaworska J; Vanrolleghem PA
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(3):39-46. PubMed ID: 14518853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probabilistic approaches in the effect assessment of toxic chemicals. What are the benefits and limitations?
    Scheringer M; Steinbach D; Escher B; Hungerbühler K
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2002; 9(5):307-14. PubMed ID: 12391805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probabilistic uncertainty analysis of the European Union system for the evaluation of substances multimedia regional distribution model.
    Matthies M; Berding V; Beyer A
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2004 Oct; 23(10):2494-502. PubMed ID: 15511110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: V. Combining landscape-level exposures and ecotoxicological effects data to characterize risks.
    Maund SJ; Travis KZ; Hendley P; Giddings JM; Solomon KR
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2001 Mar; 20(3):687-92. PubMed ID: 11349872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of five nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes).
    Coll C; Notter D; Gottschalk F; Sun T; Som C; Nowack B
    Nanotoxicology; 2016; 10(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 26554717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New technique for estimating thresholds of toxicity in ecological risk assessment.
    Hanson ML; Solomon KR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Aug; 36(15):3257-64. PubMed ID: 12188350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic exposure analysis for chemical risk characterization.
    Bogen KT; Cullen AC; Frey HC; Price PS
    Toxicol Sci; 2009 May; 109(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 19223660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Probabilistic environmental risk assessment.
    Verdonck F; Janssen C; Thas O; Jaworska J; Vanrolleghem PA
    Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(4):13-9. PubMed ID: 15954257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health risk characterisation for environmental pollutants with a new concept of overall risk probability.
    Cao Q; Yu Q; Connell DW
    J Hazard Mater; 2011 Mar; 187(1-3):480-7. PubMed ID: 21295403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental risk assessment of pharmaceutical drug substances--conceptual considerations.
    Länge R; Dietrich D
    Toxicol Lett; 2002 May; 131(1-2):97-104. PubMed ID: 11988362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental Risk Assessment Strategy for Nanomaterials.
    Scott-Fordsmand JJ; Peijnenburg WJGM; Semenzin E; Nowack B; Hunt N; Hristozov D; Marcomini A; Irfan MA; Jiménez AS; Landsiedel R; Tran L; Oomen AG; Bos PMJ; Hund-Rinke K
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 29048395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health risk characterization of chlorpyrifos using epidemiological dose-response data and probabilistic techniques: a case study with rice farmers in Vietnam.
    Phung DT; Connell D; Yu Q; Chu C
    Risk Anal; 2013 Sep; 33(9):1596-607. PubMed ID: 23469779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Risk assessment considerations with regard to the potential impacts of pesticides on endangered species.
    Brain RA; Teed RS; Bang J; Thorbek P; Perine J; Peranginangin N; Kim M; Valenti T; Chen W; Breton RL; Rodney SI; Moore DR
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Jan; 11(1):102-17. PubMed ID: 25091316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new method for generating distributions of biomonitoring equivalents to support exposure assessment and prioritization.
    Phillips MB; Sobus JR; George BJ; Isaacs K; Conolly R; Tan YM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Aug; 69(3):434-42. PubMed ID: 24845241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of toxic equivalency factor distributions in probabilistic risk assessments for dioxins, furans, and PCBs.
    Finley BL; Connor KT; Scott PK
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2003 Mar; 66(6):533-50. PubMed ID: 12712595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using landscape ecology to focus ecological risk assessment and guide risk management decision-making.
    Kapustka LA; Galbraith H; Luxon BM; Yocum J
    Toxicol Ind Health; 2001 Jun; 17(5-10):236-46. PubMed ID: 12539868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Refined avian risk assessment for chlorpyrifos in the United States.
    Moore DR; Teed RS; Greer CD; Solomon KR; Giesy JP
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014; 231():163-217. PubMed ID: 24723136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of species sensitivity distribution in aquatic probabilistic ecological risk assessment of cypermethrin: a case study in an urban stream in South China.
    Li H; You J
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Mar; 34(3):640-8. PubMed ID: 25545801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: IV. Landscape-level exposure characterization.
    Travis KZ; Hendley P
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2001 Mar; 20(3):679-86. PubMed ID: 11349871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.