These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12959731)

  • 1. Direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation is feasible, safe, and more cost-effective in selected patients: evidence to date indicating similar late outcomes.
    Ijsselmuiden AJ; Tangelder GJ; Cotton JM; Vaijifdar B; Kiemeneij F; Slagboom T; v d Wieken R; Serruys PW; Laarman GJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2003; 5(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 12959731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct stenting with TAXUS stents seems to be as safe and effective as with predilatation. A post hoc analysis of TAXUS II.
    Silber S; Hamburger J; Grube E; Pfisterer M; Belardi J; Webb J; Zmudka K; Nienaber C; Hauptman K; Rutsch W; Dawkins K; Drzewiecki J; Koglin J; Colombo A
    Herz; 2004 Mar; 29(2):171-80. PubMed ID: 15057438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of operator volume on overall major adverse cardiac events following direct coronary stent implantation versus stenting after predilatation.
    IJsselmuiden S; Kiemeneij F; Tangelder G; Slagboom T; van der Wieken R; Serruys P; Laarman G
    Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2004; 6(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 15204167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of coronary artery stents on mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction: meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a strategy of routine stenting with that of balloon angioplasty.
    Al Suwaidi J; Holmes DR; Salam AM; Lennon R; Berger PB
    Am Heart J; 2004 May; 147(5):815-22. PubMed ID: 15131536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The paclitaxel-eluting stent in percutaneous coronary intervention: Part II. Comparison with the sirolimus-eluting stent, economics, and unanswered questions.
    Ray GM; Nawarskas JJ; Frishman WH
    Cardiol Rev; 2006; 14(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 16628023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct stenting compared to conventional stenting in Diabetic Patients Undergoing Elective Angioplasty for Coronary Artery Disease (DECIDE): a multicenter, open label, randomized, controlled efficacy study.
    Tan HC; Lim YT; Rosli TL; Sim KH; Tan KH; Lee CH; Ismail O; Azman W
    Am Heart J; 2004 Dec; 148(6):1007-11. PubMed ID: 15632886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The comparison of early and late outcome of direct and conventional stenting of patients with st elevation myocardial infarction.
    Tacoy G; Yazici GE; Erden M; Timurkaynak T
    Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 Jun; 3(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 19465441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Latin American randomized trial of balloon angioplasty versus coronary stenting in diabetic patients with small vessel reference size (Latin American Small Vessel [LASMAL II] Trial): immediate and long-term results.
    Rodriguez AE; Rodriguez Alemparte M; Fernandez Pereira C; Vigo CF; Sampaolesi A; Bernardi V; Marchand E; Tronge J; Palacios IF;
    Am Heart J; 2005 Jul; 150(1):188. PubMed ID: 16086559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A multicenter, randomized study to test immunosuppressive therapy with oral prednisone for the prevention of restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions: cortisone plus BMS or DES versus BMS alone to eliminate restenosis (CEREA-DES) - study design and rationale.
    Ribichini F; Tomai F; De Luca G; Boccuzzi G; Presbitero P; Pesarini G; Ferrero V; Ghini AS; Pastori F; De Luca L; Zavalloni D; Soregaroli D; Garbo R; Franchi E; Marino P; Minelli M; Vassanelli C
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2009 Feb; 10(2):192-9. PubMed ID: 19377384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Immediate and long-term results of coronary stent implantation without predilatation (direct stenting) in patients with coronary heart disease].
    Puretskiĭ MV; Abugov SA; Saakian IuM
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2003; (4):16-24. PubMed ID: 14619395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions: to stent one branch or both?
    Assali AR; Assa HV; Ben-Dor I; Teplitsky I; Solodky A; Brosh D; Fuchs S; Kornowski R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Dec; 68(6):891-6. PubMed ID: 17086532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention on proximal versus non-proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, proximal left circumflex, and proximal right coronary artery: a cross-sectional study.
    Alidoosti M; Salarifar M; Zeinali AM; Kassaian SE; Dehkordi MR
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2007 Mar; 7():7. PubMed ID: 17335586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon pre-dilation: incidence of enzyme release and follow-up results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized study. The CK and Troponin I Estimation in direct STenting (CK TEST) trial.
    Balducelli M; Varani E; Vecchi G; Paloscia L; Manari A; Santarelli A; Cappi B; Shoeib A; Valenti S; Maresta A;
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2007 Jun; 55(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 17534246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct stenting may limit myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Nageh T; Thomas MR; Sherwood RA; Harris BM; Jewitt DE; Wainwright RJ
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2003 Mar; 15(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 12612383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical economic considerations of coronary stenting.
    Szucs TD
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1999 Nov; 129(45):1701-11. PubMed ID: 10595380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In-hospital and late clinical outcomes of direct stenting strategy versus stenting after predilatation for the treatment of coronary artery lesions.
    Alidoosti M; Salarifar M; Kassaian SE; Zeinali AH; Dehkordi MR; Fathollahi MS
    Indian Heart J; 2008; 60(4):318-24. PubMed ID: 19242009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic outcomes analysis of stenting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for patients with coronary artery disease in Japan.
    Ikeda S; Bosch J; Banz K; Schneller P
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2000 Apr; 12(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 10785672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term outcomes after stenting of bifurcation lesions with the "crush" technique: predictors of an adverse outcome.
    Hoye A; Iakovou I; Ge L; van Mieghem CA; Ong AT; Cosgrave J; Sangiorgi GM; Airoldi F; Montorfano M; Michev I; Chieffo A; Carlino M; Corvaja N; Aoki J; Rodriguez Granillo GA; Valgimigli M; Sianos G; van der Giessen WJ; de Feyter PJ; van Domburg RT; Serruys PW; Colombo A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 May; 47(10):1949-58. PubMed ID: 16697310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events: six month results of a randomized trial.
    IJsselmuiden AJ; Serruys PW; Scholte A; Kiemeneij F; Slagboom T; vd Wieken LR; Tangelder GJ; Laarman GJ
    Eur Heart J; 2003 Mar; 24(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 12633544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive cardiac operations.
    Ferraris VA; Ferraris SP
    Heart Surg Forum; 2001; 4 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 11178305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.