151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12959758)
1. Stochastic finite element analysis of biological systems: comparison of a simple intervertebral disc model with experimental results.
Espino DM; Meakin JR; Hukins DW; Reid JE
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Aug; 6(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 12959758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Statistical factorial analysis on the poroelastic material properties sensitivity of the lumbar intervertebral disc under compression, flexion and axial rotation.
Malandrino A; Planell JA; Lacroix D
J Biomech; 2009 Dec; 42(16):2780-8. PubMed ID: 19796766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study.
Strange DG; Fisher ST; Boughton PC; Kishen TJ; Diwan AD
Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):602-9. PubMed ID: 20547110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of tissue engineered intervertebral discs under complex loads.
Yao J; Turteltaub SR; Ducheyne P
Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(3):377-87. PubMed ID: 16168476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical factorial analysis on the material property sensitivity of the mechanical responses of the C4-C6 under compression, anterior and posterior shear.
Ng HW; Teo EC; Lee VS
J Biomech; 2004 May; 37(5):771-7. PubMed ID: 15047007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental and model determination of human intervertebral disc osmoviscoelasticity.
Schroeder Y; Elliott DM; Wilson W; Baaijens FP; Huyghe JM
J Orthop Res; 2008 Aug; 26(8):1141-6. PubMed ID: 18327799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The biomechanics of human femurs in axial and torsional loading: comparison of finite element analysis, human cadaveric femurs, and synthetic femurs.
Papini M; Zdero R; Schemitsch EH; Zalzal P
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 17227093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Micro-finite element simulation of trabecular-bone post-yield behaviour--effects of material model, element size and type.
Verhulp E; Van Rietbergen B; Muller R; Huiskes R
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2008 Aug; 11(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 18568833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus.
Schmidt H; Heuer F; Simon U; Kettler A; Rohlmann A; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 16439042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of factors influencing finite element vertebral model predictions.
Jones AC; Wilcox RK
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Dec; 129(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 18067394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulation of inhomogeneous rather than homogeneous poroelastic tissue material properties within disc annulus and nucleus better predicts cervical spine response: a C3-T1 finite element model analysis under compression and moment loadings.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Feb; 36(4):E245-55. PubMed ID: 21270714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A combined finite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles.
Goel VK; Kong W; Han JS; Weinstein JN; Gilbertson LG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1531-41. PubMed ID: 8235826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanics of the aging spine.
Board D; Stemper BD; Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Shender B; Paskoff G
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2006; 42():1-6. PubMed ID: 16817576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress distribution in the intervertebral disc correlates with strength distribution in subdiscal trabecular bone in the porcine lumbar spine.
Ryan G; Pandit A; Apatsidis D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Aug; 23(7):859-69. PubMed ID: 18423954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relative contributions of strain-dependent permeability and fixed charged density of proteoglycans in predicting cervical disc biomechanics: a poroelastic C5-C6 finite element model study.
Hussain M; Natarajan RN; Chaudhary G; An HS; Andersson GB
Med Eng Phys; 2011 May; 33(4):438-45. PubMed ID: 21167763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental validation of a finite element model of a human cadaveric tibia.
Gray HA; Taddei F; Zavatsky AB; Cristofolini L; Gill HS
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031016. PubMed ID: 18532865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A meta-model analysis of a finite element simulation for defining poroelastic properties of intervertebral discs.
Nikkhoo M; Hsu YC; Haghpanahi M; Parnianpour M; Wang JL
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jun; 227(6):672-82. PubMed ID: 23636748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of biomechanical function at ideal and varied surgical placement for two lumbar artificial disc implant designs: mobile-core versus fixed-core.
Moumene M; Geisler FH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):1840-51. PubMed ID: 17762291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
