These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12959909)

  • 1. Information integration in judgements of time to contact.
    DeLucia P; Kaiser M; Bush J; Meyer L; Sweet B
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Oct; 56(7):1165-89. PubMed ID: 12959909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does binocular disparity or familiar size information override effects of relative size on judgements of time to contact?
    DeLucia PR
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jul; 58(5):865-86. PubMed ID: 16194939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of a moving distractor object on time-to-contact judgments.
    Oberfeld D; Hecht H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):605-23. PubMed ID: 18505327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple sources of information and time-to-contact judgments.
    Kim NG; Grocki MJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1946-58. PubMed ID: 16469351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of pictorial depth information on projected size judgments.
    Farran EK; Whitaker A; Patel N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 19304611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-to-contact judgments of an approaching object that is partially concealed by an occluder.
    DeLucia PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 15053689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of task-irrelevant texture motion on time-to-contact judgments.
    Oberfeld D; Hecht H; Landwehr K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):581-96. PubMed ID: 21264724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of optic expansion rates when judging the relative time to contact of familiar objects.
    Hosking SG; Crassini B
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 21628397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual processing of the impending collision of a looming object: time to collision revisited.
    Yan JJ; Lorv B; Li H; Sun HJ
    J Vis; 2011 Oct; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 22003252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating the relative weights of visual and auditory tau versus heuristic-based cues for time-to-contact judgments in realistic, familiar scenes by older and younger adults.
    Keshavarz B; Campos JL; DeLucia PR; Oberfeld D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):929-944. PubMed ID: 28097504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judgements of time to contact are affected by rate of appearance of visible texture.
    Jacobs DM; Díaz A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jun; 63(6):1041-8. PubMed ID: 20373227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The development of depth perception from motion parallax in infancy.
    Nawrot E; Mayo SL; Nawrot M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):194-9. PubMed ID: 19304609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgements.
    Livesey EJ; Boakes RA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Oct; 57(4):361-79. PubMed ID: 15513261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The contribution of monocular depth cues to scene perception by pigeons.
    Cavoto BR; Cook RG
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jul; 17(7):628-34. PubMed ID: 16866750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory enhancement of visual temporal order judgment.
    Hairston WD; Hodges DA; Burdette JH; Wallace MT
    Neuroreport; 2006 May; 17(8):791-5. PubMed ID: 16708016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the visual perception of a runway model in pilots and nonpilots during simulated night landing approaches.
    Mertens HW
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1978 Sep; 49(9):1043-55. PubMed ID: 697665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First impressions: gait cues drive reliable trait judgements.
    Thoresen JC; Vuong QC; Atkinson AP
    Cognition; 2012 Sep; 124(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 22717166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: toward a method.
    DeLucia PR; Novak JB
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Aug; 59(6):913-28. PubMed ID: 9270365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective temporal attention enhances the temporal resolution of visual perception: Evidence from a temporal order judgment task.
    Correa A; Sanabria D; Spence C; Tudela P; Lupiáñez J
    Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 1070(1):202-5. PubMed ID: 16403468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Information integration in multiple cue judgment: a division of labor hypothesis.
    Juslin P; Karlsson L; Olsson H
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):259-98. PubMed ID: 17376423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.