These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1296000)
1. [What may be expected from endorectal echography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local extension of cancer of the prostate?]. Cornud F; Belin X; Fromont G; Chrétien Y; Hélénon O; Boisrond L; Casanova JM; Meuriot T; Moreau JF; Dufour B J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 73(11):617-27. PubMed ID: 1296000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [What may be expected from endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of local extension of cancer of the prostate?]. Cornud F; Belin X; Fromont G; Chretien Y; Helenon O; Boisrond L; Casanova JM; Meuriot T; Moreau JM; Dufour B J Urol (Paris); 1991; 97(4-5):179-88. PubMed ID: 1761861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Locoregional staging of prostatic carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in 75 patients treated with radical prostatectomy]. Gualdi GF; Casciani E; Ferriano MG; Polettini E Radiol Med; 1998 May; 95(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 9687928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the local staging of prostate cancer with histopathological correlation. Bates TS; Gillatt DA; Cavanagh PM; Speakman M Br J Urol; 1997 Jun; 79(6):927-32. PubMed ID: 9202562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Staging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound in stages A and B prostatic cancer. Vapnek JM; Hricak H; Shinohara K; Popovich M; Carroll P Urol Int; 1994; 53(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 7855937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of image fusion in the staging of prostatic carcinoma. Selli C; Caramella D; Giusti S; Conti A; Tognetti A; Mogorovich A; De Maria M; Bartolozzi C Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17310289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The value of transrectal MRI in the staging of localized prostate cancer]. Pariente JL; Jacob F; Trillaud H; Deminiere C; Khan H; Ferrière JM; Grenier N; Le Guillou M Prog Urol; 1997 Jun; 7(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 9273074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Staging of prostatic carcinoma: TRUS prospective study versus endocoil MRI]. Mearini L; Rosi P; Zucchi A; Mearini E; Vivacqua C; Salomone U; Regi L; Porena M Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2002 Dec; 74(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 12508760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of transrectal ultrasound imaging and the results of systematic biopsy with pathological examination of radical prostatectomy specimens. Gohji K; Morisue K; Kizaki T; Fujii A Br J Urol; 1995 Jun; 75(6):758-65. PubMed ID: 7613834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Invasion of the seminal vesicles by prostatic cancer: detection with transrectal sonography. Terris MK; McNeal JE; Stamey TA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Oct; 155(4):811-5. PubMed ID: 2119114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Alternative for ultrasonographic assessment: role of magnetic resonance with endorectal coil for prostate and seminal vesicle biopsy]. Giannotti P; De Maria M; Cuttano MG Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2000 Dec; 72(4):161-2. PubMed ID: 11221029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for staging of prostatic cancer]. Hayashi N; Kawamura J; Sugimura Y Hinyokika Kiyo; 1996 Oct; 42(10):767-73. PubMed ID: 8951473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging of clinically localized prostatic cancer. Ikonen S; Kärkkäinen P; Kivisaari L; Salo JO; Taari K; Vehmas T; Tervahartiala P; Rannikko S J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):915-9. PubMed ID: 9474182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Magnetic resonance imaging of seminal vesicles. Normal and pathological aspects]. Roy C; Morel M; Saussine C; Vetter JM; Rimmelin A; Jacqmin D; Bourjat P J Radiol; 1993 Mar; 74(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 8496847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI with an endorectal coil for staging of clinically localised prostate cancer prior to radical prostatectomy. Rørvik J; Halvorsen OJ; Albrektsen G; Ersland L; Daehlin L; Haukaas S Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 9933375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local staging of prostate cancer by endorectal MRI using fast spin-echo sequences: prospective correlation with pathological findings after radical prostatectomy. Cornud F; Belin X; Flam T; Chrétien Y; Deslignieres S; Paraf F; Casanova JM; Thiounn N; Hélénon O; Debré B; Dufour B; Moreau JF Br J Urol; 1996 Jun; 77(6):843-50. PubMed ID: 8705219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance image in the diagnosis and evaluation of extra-prostatic extension and involvement of seminal vesicles of prostate cancer: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Silva RC; Sasse AD; Matheus WE; Ferreira U Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 23683681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Magnetic resonance tomography with endorectal coil for examination of prostate and seminal vesicles]. Rørvik J Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Feb; 120(6):689-92. PubMed ID: 10806882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Seminal vesicle volume as a sonographic predictor of prostate cancer stage. Cummings JM; Boullier JA; Sankari BR; Parra RO Urology; 1994 Aug; 44(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 8048195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]