430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12961788)
21. Limiting damages for "pain and suffering" in medical malpractice.
Sloan FA
N C Med J; 2003; 64(4):191-4. PubMed ID: 12971246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Foiled again. Senate again fails to pass malpractice reform.
Fong T
Mod Healthc; 2004 Mar; 34(9):18. PubMed ID: 15029683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The myth of the independent judiciary.
Gale AH
Mo Med; 2007; 104(5):378-80. PubMed ID: 18018518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Keeping the cap. AMA won't back down from $250,000 limit.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2003 Jun; 33(25):25, 28. PubMed ID: 12858726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Society attacks med mal challenge on multiple levels.
Busalacchi S
WMJ; 2005 Sep; 104(7):11-2. PubMed ID: 16294591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Health courts and other alternative medical liability solutions.
; DeVito S
Dis Mon; 2011 Jun; 57(6):291-312. PubMed ID: 21782990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Seeking shelter from rising malpractice costs.
Norland S
Healthc Financ Manage; 2003 Nov; 57(11):58-64. PubMed ID: 14626706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. More than just caps are needed to solve New Jersey's professional liability crisis.
Chang L
N J Med; 2004 May; 101(5):29-30. PubMed ID: 15185519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Short on progress. Joint Commission jumps into medical liability debate.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2005 Feb; 35(7):4. PubMed ID: 15736783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Malpractice claims involving pediatricians.
Freeman JM; Freeman AD
Pediatrics; 2007 Oct; 120(4):933-4. PubMed ID: 17908788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The state of medical liability reform.
Pollack J; Selzer D; Meara JG
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2011 Jul; 96(7):22-5. PubMed ID: 22315898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Problems with the administration of remittitur in medical malpractice cases. Does a solution exist?
Keane DB
J Leg Med; 2004 Mar; 25(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 15204914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. An empirical examination of the equal protection challenge to contingency fee restrictions in medical malpractice reform statutes.
Dwyer CL
Duke Law J; 2006 Nov; 56(2):611-41. PubMed ID: 17302005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Jumping hurdles. Some AHRQ grant ideas moving ahead.
Robeznieks A
Mod Healthc; 2012 Apr; 42(18):17. PubMed ID: 22667039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Worried in Wisconsin. With damage cap scrapped, panel will study options.
Robeznieks A
Mod Healthc; 2005 Aug; 35(34):56. PubMed ID: 16158568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Consumer deductibles: how to distribute more equitably the risks of medical malpractice and compensate victims adequately without statutory damage caps.
Ledbetter L
Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2006; 41(4):1141-61. PubMed ID: 17091568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Defending the practice of medicine.
Anderson RE
Arch Intern Med; 2004 Jun; 164(11):1173-8. PubMed ID: 15197041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Leveling the paying field: can malpractice be made fair? Pennsylvania study examines various reforms.
Shinkman R
Healthc Leadersh Manag Rep; 2003 Jun; 11(6):10, 12. PubMed ID: 12959061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Give a little to get a little? 'Quid pro quo' the key to medical liability caps.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2003 Feb; 99(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 12647630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Malpractice claims drop: report.
DerGurahian J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Oct; 37(40):12. PubMed ID: 18018372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
