BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12962098)

  • 1. An ethicist's perspective on human radiation tests.
    Graber GC
    Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):115-21. PubMed ID: 12962098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical testing: issues and ethics.
    Mossman KL
    Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):90-101. PubMed ID: 12962094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation report in retrospect.
    Eisenbud M
    Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 12962101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Secret human experiments test trust in government.
    Guttman D
    Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):109-14. PubMed ID: 12962097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adding to the canon: the final report.
    Meslin EM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(5):34-6. PubMed ID: 11644871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DOE nurtures openness to mend past miscues.
    O'Leary HR
    Forum Appl Res Public Policy; 1997; 12(3):102-8. PubMed ID: 12962095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disclosure and consent: through the Cold War prism.
    Guttman D
    Account Res; 1998 Jan; 6(1-2):1-14. PubMed ID: 11660585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
    Moreno JD
    J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation doctors abused trust in the name of science.
    Kiernan V
    New Sci; 1995 Oct; 148(1999):8. PubMed ID: 11656493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. U.S. advisory committee investigates human radiation experiments.
    Kimball DG
    Med Glob Surviv; 1994 Sep; 1(3):180-1. PubMed ID: 11654180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atomic guinea pigs.
    Antonio M
    N Y Times Mag; 1997 Aug; ():39-43. PubMed ID: 11647250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whatever made them do it?
    Estling R
    New Sci; 1995 Jan; 145(1961):48-9. PubMed ID: 11656388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Panel suggests using inmates in drug trials.
    Urbina I
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Aug; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 16918009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human subjects: America's nuclear guinea pigs.
    Gurman L
    Sci People; 1988; 20(4):16-20. PubMed ID: 11650130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychiatric guinea pigs are left in limbo.
    Boyce N
    New Sci; 1998 Nov; 160(2162):21. PubMed ID: 11660595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Panel says U.S. may have done thousands of human radiation experiments.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1994 Oct; ():10. PubMed ID: 11647046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Payments to make amends for secret tests of radiation.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Nov; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11647208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation tests were widespread: top officials knew of experiments, panel says.
    Lee G
    Washington Post; 1994 Oct; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Government could be sued over human experimentation problems.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1996 Oct; 11(10):6. PubMed ID: 11656530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hostile reception to US misconduct report.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6584):639. PubMed ID: 8649502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.